The published 50-state ranking
Compare how states treat retirement income, along with living costs, homeownership costs, estate taxes and quality of life.
Higher scores mean a stronger result on the factors this guide measures. They do not guarantee a better fit for your household or investment. Ties stay tied, and missing data is clearly marked.
Taxstra’s published 2026 ranking. One methodology, applied consistently to every state. 80% financial evidence and 20% WalletHub Quality of Life. See the factors and scoring rules.
Pick a state. See how it fits.
Explore grades out of 10, category ranks and the tradeoffs behind them. Each state uses the same published factors and weights.
The map loads when the page opens. All 50 states are available in the selector and table.
Gray = unavailable or provisional; no comparable rank. Alaska and Hawaii shown as insets.
Boundaries: U.S. Census Bureau / US Atlas.
Why Illinois scores this way
Illinois ranks #12 of 50, with 7.2 / 10. The category tiles show its strengths and tradeoffs.
A higher category score means a stronger result on that measure. Check the “Good fit for” and “Less suited to” notes against your own priorities.
2026 state guideHigh-income retirees
Illinois
Taxstra’s state comparison
Overall score#12 in the comparison
80% cost and financial score (6.7/10) · 20% quality of life (9.3/10)
How to read this score
Annual plan-income exposure is not tax due. A separate $5 million resident cash estate passing to one child aged 40 supplies the estate/inheritance-tax factor; it is not an annual cost or an assumption that every retiree owns $5 million. Rates, general deductions, credits, investment taxes, sales taxes and personalized healthcare costs remain separate.
Retirement income subject to tax
#1 of 50 · 28% weight$0 of the example couple’s retirement-plan income remains subject to tax; this is income, not the tax bill.
Everyday living costs
#33 of 50 · 20% weight$99,958. What a $100,000 national spending budget would cost here; lower costs score better.
Homeowner property taxes
#45 of 50 · 12% weight$5,399 typical annual homeowner tax bill; check the specific property before budgeting.
Home insurance costs
#20 of 50 · 4% weight$1,480 average annual homeowner premium; rental and short-term rental coverage can cost differently.
State tax on a $5 million estate
#47 of 50 · 16% weight$285,714.
Quality of life
#5 of 50 · WalletHub category · 20% weightWalletHub: #5 for Quality of Life, #18 overall; this score uses the category.
Good fit for
- Retirees drawing heavily from qualified plans who want Illinois family and community ties.
Less suited to
- Investment-heavy households assuming everything received after retirement becomes exempt income.
Illinois: full analysis and evidenceRead the state-specific explanation and supporting sources.
Illinois
Back to comparison ↑Illinois is the clearest reason to separate retirement income from a state’s reputation for other taxes. Qualified traditional IRA, 401(k) and pension income in this example is subtracted, producing zero plan-income exposure. That does not exempt the household’s ordinary investments and capital gains. The property-tax category also remains in the household score, so retirement relief does not erase the cost of owning a home.
The measured household context is a 100.0 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $280,700 median owner-occupied home and a $5,399 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
Illinois adds an estate-planning question to its favorable annual retirement-income treatment. The Attorney General’s instructions for 2023–2026 use a $4 million Illinois exclusion, include adjusted taxable gifts in the filing analysis and do not provide federal-style portability. A qualifying plan distribution can be exempt during life while the accumulated assets still matter at death. The estate calculation is not simply a flat percentage of assets above $4 million.
Illinois eliminated its state 1% grocery tax on January 1, 2026, but authorized municipal or county grocery taxes and specified transit-district taxes can remain. Price groceries in the actual destination. A statewide statement that all groceries became tax-free would miss those local charges.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $0 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $0 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Illinois exempts qualifying retirement distributions during life but retains a $4 million estate exclusion with no state portability. The exclusion is a threshold, not a simple credit or a flat marginal exemption. Its interrelated calculation produces $285,714 in the Attorney General’s $5 million all-Illinois example. The agency shows zero tax at $4 million and $28 on a $3,000,100 estate plus $1 million of taxable gifts. Those examples explain why a flat-rate description of the threshold is misleading. State transfer-tax source
- Illinois Publication 120: retirement income (2025; 2026-09-12)
- Illinois Publication 120: retirement income (2026; 2026-09-12)
- Illinois Attorney General estate-tax instructions for 2023–2026 (2026; 2026-09-12)
- Illinois FY 2026-11: grocery occupation tax changes (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
Cite the state. Include the method.
Use the state, guide title, published methodology and source years when citing a score. State selection changes the card, not the ranking methodology.
Media and interview inquiries · Source data · Taxstra methodology
Full ranking table · 50 of 50 statesCompare every state’s rank, housing costs, property taxes and tax treatment.
50 of 50 states
| Rank | State | High-income retirement household grade | Home value ACS 2024 | Property-tax bill ACS 2024 median | Price index BEA 2024 | Retirement accounts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Iowa | 9.1 / 10 | $227,300 | $2,937 | 87.8 | Exempt at 55+ |
| 2 | Texas | 8.3 / 10 | $313,200 | $4,108 | 97.1 | No income tax |
| 3 | Nevada | 8.2 / 10 | $455,500 | $2,143 | 100.0 | No income tax |
| 3 | Tennessee | 8.2 / 10 | $332,600 | $1,488 | 91.9 | No income tax |
| 5 | Florida | 8.1 / 10 | $396,900 | $2,993 | 103.4 | No income tax |
| 6 | South Dakota | 8.1 / 10 | $289,600 | $2,940 | 88.6 | No income tax |
| 7 | Mississippi | 8.0 / 10 | $186,500 | $1,221 | 87.0 | Exempt |
| 8 | Pennsylvania | 8.0 / 10 | $277,600 | $3,214 | 97.6 | Exempt |
| 9 | Wyoming | 8.0 / 10 | $339,500 | $1,947 | 92.7 | No income tax |
| 10 | Michigan | 7.7 / 10 | $254,200 | $2,988 | 96.2 | Partially taxed |
| 11 | Georgia | 7.5 / 10 | $343,300 | $2,554 | 96.3 | Partially taxed |
| 12 | Illinois | 7.2 / 10 | $280,700 | $5,399 | 100.0 | Exempt |
| 13 | Washington | 6.8 / 10 | $602,200 | $4,729 | 107.0 | No income tax |
| 14 | Wisconsin | 6.8 / 10 | $294,700 | $3,680 | 94.1 | Partially taxed |
| 15 | Alabama | 6.7 / 10 | $233,300 | $890 | 88.8 | Partially taxed |
| 16 | New Hampshire | 6.6 / 10 | $458,800 | $6,707 | 104.2 | No income tax |
| 17 | Alaska | 6.6 / 10 | $376,500 | $3,976 | 102.4 | No income tax |
| 18 | Kentucky | 6.3 / 10 | $226,000 | $1,611 | 90.2 | Partially taxed |
| 19 | Ohio | 6.2 / 10 | $239,800 | $2,937 | 92.8 | Taxed |
| 20 | Kansas | 6.2 / 10 | $238,700 | $2,983 | 90.1 | Taxed |
| 21 | Oklahoma | 6.2 / 10 | $222,100 | $1,672 | 87.8 | Partially taxed |
| 22 | Indiana | 6.1 / 10 | $243,500 | $1,798 | 93.3 | Taxed |
| 23 | North Carolina | 6.0 / 10 | $333,000 | $2,044 | 94.3 | Taxed |
| 24 | Missouri | 6.0 / 10 | $254,400 | $2,021 | 90.8 | Partially taxed |
| 25 | Louisiana | 6.0 / 10 | $223,200 | $1,187 | 88.2 | Partially taxed |
| 26 | New Mexico | 5.9 / 10 | $279,900 | $1,776 | 92.2 | Partially taxed |
| 27 | Maine | 5.9 / 10 | $341,900 | $3,103 | 97.1 | Partially taxed |
| 28 | South Carolina | 5.8 / 10 | $299,500 | $1,337 | 93.7 | Partially taxed |
| 29 | Arkansas | 5.8 / 10 | $215,600 | $1,113 | 86.9 | Partially taxed |
| 30 | North Dakota | 5.6 / 10 | $266,100 | $2,550 | 89.0 | Taxed |
| 31 | West Virginia | 5.6 / 10 | $170,800 | $881 | 89.5 | Taxed |
| 32 | New York | 5.6 / 10 | $449,800 | $6,542 | 107.9 | Partially taxed |
| 33 | Idaho | 5.6 / 10 | $446,400 | $1,912 | 95.5 | Taxed |
| 34 | Nebraska | 5.6 / 10 | $263,100 | $3,739 | 90.1 | Taxed |
| 35 | Arizona | 5.5 / 10 | $426,000 | $1,828 | 100.7 | Taxed |
| 36 | Colorado | 5.5 / 10 | $574,600 | $2,828 | 103.1 | Partially taxed |
| 37 | Montana | 5.4 / 10 | $425,400 | $2,939 | 94.6 | Taxed |
| 38 | Utah | 5.3 / 10 | $545,200 | $2,648 | 98.9 | Taxed |
| 39 | Virginia | 5.2 / 10 | $403,500 | $2,872 | 101.1 | Partially taxed |
| 40 | Delaware | 5.0 / 10 | $371,600 | $1,750 | 99.8 | Partially taxed |
| 41 | California | 5.0 / 10 | $759,500 | $5,369 | 110.7 | Taxed |
| 42 | Minnesota | 4.8 / 10 | $344,600 | $3,501 | 98.6 | Taxed |
| 43 | Hawaii | 4.8 / 10 | $875,900 | $2,385 | 110.0 | Taxed |
| 44 | Maryland | 4.7 / 10 | $436,300 | $4,144 | 105.0 | Partially taxed |
| 45 | Vermont | 4.5 / 10 | $352,800 | $5,026 | 98.0 | Taxed |
| 46 | Connecticut | 4.5 / 10 | $396,900 | $6,573 | 103.6 | Partially taxed |
| 47 | New Jersey | 4.3 / 10 | $496,000 | $9,358 | 108.8 | Partially taxed |
| 48 | Oregon | 4.0 / 10 | $497,500 | $3,895 | 103.4 | Taxed |
| 49 | Massachusetts | 4.0 / 10 | $607,400 | $6,080 | 105.8 | Taxed |
| 50 | Rhode Island | 3.0 / 10 | $455,700 | $4,886 | 102.3 | Partially taxed |
Retirement income scenariosCompare the stated income mix and exemptions.
Taxstra’s published retirement-income comparison
A $300,000 retirement household can have very different results depending on where the money comes from. This comparison separates the IRA, employee-funded 401(k), private pension and Social Security before any tax rate is applied.
Tax year 2026 · Verified September 12, 2026 · Married, both age 67 · Each spouse receives half of every category.
These are fixed editorial assumptions applied consistently to every state. Browsing a state or searching the table does not alter the published comparison or its rankings.
Illinois: the income behind the comparison
The specified qualifying IRA, 401(k) and private pension distributions are outside this state income base. Other income and other taxes are separate.
The modeled Social Security benefit is excluded from this state income base.
$0 is the retirement-income subtotal remaining in this example before investment income, general deductions, credits and rates. State tax due is not calculated.
Showing 50 of 50 states.
Read the exact profile and calculation method
Income-base dollars, not taxes: each account column applies category-specific exclusions first. A shared allowance is then subtracted once. Social Security is a separate $60,000 cash category with $51,000 federally taxable. The remaining $60,000 of investment income is disclosed but its state preferences, general deductions, credits and final tax are not calculated. Military and public pensions are outside the fixed private-sector profile.
The IRA is self-funded with no exempt-pension rollover. The 401(k) consists entirely of employee elective deferrals, with no employer contribution. The private pension is employer-funded. Both spouses meet Pennsylvania’s eligible retirement-distribution conditions. There is no after-tax basis. Shared investment-and-retirement allowances are applied to qualifying plans first.
The separate investment categories are $30,000 of ordinary income and $30,000 of long-term capital gains. They are included when testing the $291,000 federal AGI, but their state taxable amounts and the final return are not calculated. Maine’s pension subtotal remains unavailable pending its precise indexed phaseout threshold. Rhode Island’s fixed-profile ineligibility is established by an explicit conservative CPI bound; that bound is not its published threshold.
Educational comparison, not individualized tax advice. Taxstra’s retirement ranking methodology
What changes the comparisonThe tax, legal and financial tradeoffs behind the ranking.
Illinois, Iowa, Mississippi and Pennsylvania can shelter qualifying retirement distributions even though they levy income taxes on other income. States without broad individual income taxes also merit a look. Taxstra compares the exact retirement income mix alongside living costs, home carrying costs and a fixed quality-of-life category weight, so tax relief is part of the decision rather than the entire decision.
What determines the retirement grade
Financial evidence receives 80% of the overall score and the named Quality of Life category receives 20%. Within the financial share, qualified-plan income exposure receives 35%, regional spending costs 25%, homeowner property taxes 15%, historical homeowner insurance 5%, and the separate $5 million estate/inheritance-tax scenario 20%. Annual income and wealth transfer are distinct questions: the estate factor is a planning preference, not an annual expense. The card displays the score and effective weight of each factor.
Start with the income, not the label “retired”
Our married household is age 67 and receives $300,000: $60,000 each from a traditional IRA, a qualified 401(k), an employer-funded private pension and Social Security, plus $30,000 of ordinary investments and $30,000 of long-term gains. Each spouse owns half of every category. The same $300,000 arriving mainly from brokerage gains can produce a different state result.
Why Illinois can be good for retirement and costly for property
The controlled Illinois plan distributions are excluded from state taxable income. Its property-tax observation remains a separate cost category, while investment income requires a separate tax calculation. An account-heavy retiree and a leveraged rental buyer are asking different questions, so there is no reason their preferred states must match.
Exemptions interact with one another
Colorado’s Social Security subtraction reduces its pension allowance. Maryland reduces its employer-plan exclusion by gross Social Security and excludes ordinary IRAs from that allowance. South Carolina coordinates its age deduction with its retirement deduction. Adding headline deductions without their offsets can materially overstate the benefit.
Estate, sales and healthcare costs remain separate decisions
An annual retirement-income exclusion does not answer what happens to assets at death. Review domicile, property location, ownership and beneficiaries with the estate plan. Price your actual taxable purchases and any major move-year purchases. For healthcare, check your physicians, prescriptions, coverage networks, supplemental premiums and long-term-care plan; statewide spending is not a personal quote.
An income-tax exemption can coexist with estate or inheritance tax
Illinois excludes qualifying retirement distributions but has a $4 million estate exclusion and no Illinois portability under its 2023–2026 instructions. Pennsylvania inheritance rates depend on the heir’s relationship. Iowa ended its inheritance tax for deaths from January 1, 2025, while Oregon retains a $1 million gross-estate filing threshold with Oregon-taxable property. These are separate tax systems and cannot be inferred from the plan-income rank.
Medicare needs a destination-specific coverage check
CMS sets the 2026 national Part B base premium at $202.90 a month and the annual deductible at $283. Income adjustments are additional and generally depend on an earlier tax return. Moving outside a Medicare Advantage or drug plan’s service area can permit a plan change. Compare the new address, prescriptions and providers through Medicare Plan Compare before using a statewide healthcare-spending average as a budget.
Make a multiyear relocation comparison
Compare the year of the move, a normal withdrawal year, a planned Roth-conversion year and the survivor’s filing situation. Include the cost of replacing the home, moving, travel and maintaining family relationships. The rank describes the specified profile and inputs; it does not say that moving is financially worthwhile for a particular household.
Put the numbers in contextA worked example with explicit assumptions.
In the controlled profile, Illinois excludes the $180,000 of qualifying traditional-plan and pension income. California generally includes that same $180,000 before general deductions. This is a $180,000 difference in plan income exposed to tax, not $180,000 of tax savings. Their separate investment-income treatment, actual rates, home costs and lifestyle value still have to be compared.
Illustration only. These assumptions describe the example, not an expected client result.
Every state, explainedBrowse all 50 state chapters, with detailed analysis and linked evidence.
AlabamaRead state analysis
Alabama
Back to comparison ↑Alabama separates pension design from the age of the person receiving it. A qualifying defined-benefit pension can be exempt while IRA and defined-contribution withdrawals remain a different calculation. That makes a household with an employer pension materially different from one living entirely on rolled-over accounts. The enacted 2026 text retains the $6,000 age-65 exclusion per recipient. With $60,000 of exempt defined-benefit pension and $12,000 of account exclusions, $108,000 remains exposed.
The measured household context is a 88.8 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $233,300 median owner-occupied home and a $890 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $108,000 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $108,000 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Alabama has neither a separately imposed estate tax nor an inheritance tax in the government inventory. The fixed resident $5 million cash estate therefore has zero state transfer tax. This is separate from federal estate tax, probate costs, the income tax on inherited retirement withdrawals and another state’s tax on property located there. State transfer-tax source
- Alabama enrolled HB341, section 40-18-19(a)(6) and (13) (2026; 2026-09-12)
- Alabama 2026 enrolled HB341: retirement exclusions, pages 3 and 6 (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
AlaskaRead state analysis
Alaska
Back to comparison ↑Alaska does not levy an individual income tax on the modeled retirement distributions. The retirement-tax result therefore ties other zero-exposure states. The household decision remains sensitive to its spending basket, travel budget and access to its chosen healthcare providers. A tax tie is not evidence that living costs or practical access are equal.
The measured household context is a 102.4 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $376,500 median owner-occupied home and a $3,976 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $0 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $0 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Alaska has neither a separately imposed estate tax nor an inheritance tax in the government inventory. The fixed resident $5 million cash estate therefore has zero state transfer tax. This is separate from federal estate tax, probate costs, the income tax on inherited retirement withdrawals and another state’s tax on property located there. State transfer-tax source
- Alaska Court System: tax matters (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
ArizonaRead state analysis
Arizona
Back to comparison ↑Arizona exempts Social Security, but the guide’s private pension and traditional-account withdrawals do not receive the special treatment reserved for qualifying government pensions. The modeled plan-income exposure is therefore broad even though the state’s rate structure may produce a different tax bill from another state with the same exposure. Private and public pension households should use separate worksheets.
The measured household context is a 100.7 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $426,000 median owner-occupied home and a $1,828 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $180,000 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $180,000 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Arizona has neither a separately imposed estate tax nor an inheritance tax in the government inventory. The fixed resident $5 million cash estate therefore has zero state transfer tax. This is separate from federal estate tax, probate costs, the income tax on inherited retirement withdrawals and another state’s tax on property located there. State transfer-tax source
- Arizona Revised Statutes 43-1022 (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
ArkansasRead state analysis
Arkansas
Back to comparison ↑Arkansas provides a limited retirement exclusion rather than a blanket exemption. With eligible distributions owned equally, the example uses $6,000 per spouse against $180,000 of plan income, leaving $168,000 exposed before general deductions. A single owner cannot automatically use both spouses’ exclusions; account ownership matters even on a joint return.
The measured household context is a 86.9 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $215,600 median owner-occupied home and a $1,113 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $168,000 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $168,000 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Arkansas has neither a separately imposed estate tax nor an inheritance tax in the government inventory. The fixed resident $5 million cash estate therefore has zero state transfer tax. This is separate from federal estate tax, probate costs, the income tax on inherited retirement withdrawals and another state’s tax on property located there. State transfer-tax source
- Arkansas Revenue Subject 206: pensions and annuities (2023; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
CaliforniaRead state analysis
California
Back to comparison ↑California exempts Social Security but generally taxes the traditional distributions and private pension used here. Its retirement-income exposure score is therefore weak for this particular income mix. The separate livability component can still support California for a household prioritizing its amenities, family or medical relationships. A strong lifestyle fit deserves a real budget, not dismissal because of one tax category.
The measured household context is a 110.7 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $759,500 median owner-occupied home and a $5,369 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $180,000 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $180,000 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: California has neither a separately imposed estate tax nor an inheritance tax in the government inventory. The fixed resident $5 million cash estate therefore has zero state transfer tax. This is separate from federal estate tax, probate costs, the income tax on inherited retirement withdrawals and another state’s tax on property located there. State transfer-tax source
- California FTB Publication 1005: pension and annuity guidelines (2025; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
ColoradoRead state analysis
Colorado
Back to comparison ↑Colorado’s age-65 Social Security subtraction can shelter the full federally taxable benefit. That subtraction also reduces the separate pension-and-annuity allowance. Each modeled spouse has $25,500 of federally taxable Social Security, enough to use the $24,000 allowance, so no additional exclusion is assigned to the $180,000 of other plan income. Adding both benefits in full would overstate relief.
The measured household context is a 103.1 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $574,600 median owner-occupied home and a $2,828 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $180,000 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $180,000 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Colorado has neither a separately imposed estate tax nor an inheritance tax in the government inventory. The fixed resident $5 million cash estate therefore has zero state transfer tax. This is separate from federal estate tax, probate costs, the income tax on inherited retirement withdrawals and another state’s tax on property located there. State transfer-tax source
- Colorado 2025 income-tax filing guide, DR0104AD instructions (2025; 2026-09-12)
- Colorado: Social Security, pensions and annuities (2025; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
ConnecticutRead state analysis
Connecticut
Back to comparison ↑Connecticut’s pension and IRA relief is income-sensitive. The example’s $291,000 federal AGI is above the joint-return range for that relief, so all $180,000 of its private plan income remains exposed. Lower-income retirees can have a different outcome. Social Security has its own state calculation and is not included in this plan-income measure.
The measured household context is a 103.6 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $396,900 median owner-occupied home and a $6,573 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $180,000 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $180,000 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Connecticut follows the $15 million federal basic exclusion for 2026 and applies 12% above it. Prior Connecticut taxable gifts can consume the exclusion; a nontaxable estate may still have a probate-court filing. This no-gift $5 million estate owes no Connecticut estate tax. State transfer-tax source
- Connecticut DRS senior-citizen tax guidance (2026; 2026-09-12)
- Connecticut tax tips for senior citizens (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
DelawareRead state analysis
Delaware
Back to comparison ↑Delaware allows an age-based retirement exclusion that can also involve eligible investment income. Both modeled spouses are over 60; assigning $12,500 each to plan income leaves $155,000 exposed. Because the allowance is shared across qualifying categories, the same dollars cannot be used again to shelter investment income in a separate calculation.
The measured household context is a 99.8 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $371,600 median owner-occupied home and a $1,750 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $155,000 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $155,000 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Delaware has neither a separately imposed estate tax nor an inheritance tax in the government inventory. The fixed resident $5 million cash estate therefore has zero state transfer tax. This is separate from federal estate tax, probate costs, the income tax on inherited retirement withdrawals and another state’s tax on property located there. State transfer-tax source
- Delaware Code Title 30, section 1106 (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
FloridaRead state analysis
Florida
Back to comparison ↑Florida does not impose an individual income tax on the modeled retirement income. That produces the same plan-exposure result as several states with selective retirement exemptions. The comparison then turns to a real home, insurance contract and spending pattern. A coastal and inland property can have very different insurance and maintenance economics despite receiving the same statewide retirement-tax result.
The measured household context is a 103.4 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $396,900 median owner-occupied home and a $2,993 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $0 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $0 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Florida has neither a separately imposed estate tax nor an inheritance tax in the government inventory. The fixed resident $5 million cash estate therefore has zero state transfer tax. This is separate from federal estate tax, probate costs, the income tax on inherited retirement withdrawals and another state’s tax on property located there. State transfer-tax source
- Florida Revenue: personal income tax FAQ (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
GeorgiaRead state analysis
Georgia
Back to comparison ↑Georgia’s age-65 retirement exclusion is substantial but limited. The model allocates $65,000 per spouse to eligible plan income, leaving $50,000 of $180,000 exposed. Social Security is separate. An investment-heavy household should coordinate the allowance across all eligible categories rather than assign the full exclusion repeatedly to pensions, interest and gains.
The measured household context is a 96.3 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $343,300 median owner-occupied home and a $2,554 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $50,000 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $50,000 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Georgia has neither a separately imposed estate tax nor an inheritance tax in the government inventory. The fixed resident $5 million cash estate therefore has zero state transfer tax. This is separate from federal estate tax, probate costs, the income tax on inherited retirement withdrawals and another state’s tax on property located there. State transfer-tax source
- Georgia Revenue retirement-income exclusion (2026; 2026-09-12)
- Georgia retirement income exclusion (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
HawaiiRead state analysis
Hawaii
Back to comparison ↑Hawaii distinguishes employer-funded pension benefits from distributions attributable to employee contributions and individual retirement accounts. The controlled example assumes the entire $60,000 defined-benefit pension was employer-funded; that leaves $120,000 from traditional accounts exposed. Actual plan funding history can change the answer. Housing, island location and travel remain separate from the tax classification.
The measured household context is a 110.0 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $875,900 median owner-occupied home and a $2,385 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
The funding assumption is specific: the entire modeled 401(k) comes from voluntary employee deferrals, the IRA is self-funded without an exempt-pension rollover, and only the private defined-benefit pension is employer-funded. Hawaii TIR 96-5 allocates treatment when employee and employer funding are mixed. An actual 401(k) with employer matching can therefore produce a different exposed amount than this example.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $120,000 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $120,000 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Hawaii’s $5.49 million state exclusion is separate from the much larger federal exclusion. The fixed $5 million estate is below it, but a larger estate can owe Hawaii tax even when no federal tax is due. The current state instructions require a pro forma federal computation when only a Hawaii return is required. State transfer-tax source
- Hawaii TIR 96-5, August 14, 1996: continuing pension-funding guidance (1996; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
IdahoRead state analysis
Idaho
Back to comparison ↑Idaho’s qualifying public-pension deduction is not a general exemption for every retiree. This private-sector profile receives no special plan-income subtraction, leaving $180,000 exposed before general deductions. The result does not say that Idaho has the largest tax bill: the tax rate, deductions and other income must still be applied. A former public employee needs a separate eligibility review.
The measured household context is a 95.5 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $446,400 median owner-occupied home and a $1,912 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $180,000 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $180,000 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Idaho has neither a separately imposed estate tax nor an inheritance tax in the government inventory. The fixed resident $5 million cash estate therefore has zero state transfer tax. This is separate from federal estate tax, probate costs, the income tax on inherited retirement withdrawals and another state’s tax on property located there. State transfer-tax source
- Idaho Retirement Benefits Deduction (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
IllinoisRead state analysis
Illinois
Back to comparison ↑Illinois is the clearest reason to separate retirement income from a state’s reputation for other taxes. Qualified traditional IRA, 401(k) and pension income in this example is subtracted, producing zero plan-income exposure. That does not exempt the household’s ordinary investments and capital gains. The property-tax category also remains in the household score, so retirement relief does not erase the cost of owning a home.
The measured household context is a 100.0 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $280,700 median owner-occupied home and a $5,399 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
Illinois adds an estate-planning question to its favorable annual retirement-income treatment. The Attorney General’s instructions for 2023–2026 use a $4 million Illinois exclusion, include adjusted taxable gifts in the filing analysis and do not provide federal-style portability. A qualifying plan distribution can be exempt during life while the accumulated assets still matter at death. The estate calculation is not simply a flat percentage of assets above $4 million.
Illinois eliminated its state 1% grocery tax on January 1, 2026, but authorized municipal or county grocery taxes and specified transit-district taxes can remain. Price groceries in the actual destination. A statewide statement that all groceries became tax-free would miss those local charges.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $0 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $0 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Illinois exempts qualifying retirement distributions during life but retains a $4 million estate exclusion with no state portability. The exclusion is a threshold, not a simple credit or a flat marginal exemption. Its interrelated calculation produces $285,714 in the Attorney General’s $5 million all-Illinois example. The agency shows zero tax at $4 million and $28 on a $3,000,100 estate plus $1 million of taxable gifts. Those examples explain why a flat-rate description of the threshold is misleading. State transfer-tax source
- Illinois Publication 120: retirement income (2025; 2026-09-12)
- Illinois Publication 120: retirement income (2026; 2026-09-12)
- Illinois Attorney General estate-tax instructions for 2023–2026 (2026; 2026-09-12)
- Illinois FY 2026-11: grocery occupation tax changes (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
IndianaRead state analysis
Indiana
Back to comparison ↑Indiana generally includes the private pension and traditional distributions modeled here. Certain civil-service and military benefits have separate treatment, but they are not part of this profile. County income taxes can also matter to a resident household; a state-only rate is not a completed Indiana projection. Compare the county of residence along with the house and the state return.
The measured household context is a 93.3 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $243,500 median owner-occupied home and a $1,798 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $180,000 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $180,000 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Indiana has neither a separately imposed estate tax nor an inheritance tax in the government inventory. The fixed resident $5 million cash estate therefore has zero state transfer tax. This is separate from federal estate tax, probate costs, the income tax on inherited retirement withdrawals and another state’s tax on property located there. State transfer-tax source
- Indiana Revenue individual deductions (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
IowaRead state analysis
Iowa
Back to comparison ↑Iowa’s qualifying retirement exclusion at age 55 or older can shelter this example’s traditional plans and private pension. The $180,000 plan-income exposure is zero even though Iowa still has an income tax on other categories. Older summaries using a small pension cap can miss this difference. Review the current Schedule 1 treatment rather than applying a pre-change retirement allowance.
The measured household context is a 87.8 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $227,300 median owner-occupied home and a $2,937 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
Iowa removed another retirement-planning distinction when its inheritance tax ended for deaths on or after January 1, 2025. That change is separate from the age-qualified retirement-income exclusion. Older estate-planning summaries and older small pension allowances can therefore mislead in two different ways; review their effective dates before using either in a relocation comparison.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $0 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $0 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Iowa ended inheritance tax for deaths on or after January 1, 2025, and no longer imposes its former estate tax. The $5 million cash estate therefore has zero Iowa estate or inheritance tax. Keep the date of death with older estate files; pre-repeal liabilities are not converted into current-year rules. State transfer-tax source
- Iowa retirement-income tax guidance (2025; 2026-09-12)
- Iowa Schedule 1: retirement income exclusion (2025; 2026-09-12)
- Iowa inheritance-tax guidance (2025; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
KansasRead state analysis
Kansas
Back to comparison ↑Kansas exempts Social Security and gives specified government retirement systems separate treatment. The private pension and traditional accounts in this example remain exposed. A retiree receiving benefits from a listed public system therefore needs a different comparison from a former private employee. Account rollovers also deserve review before assuming they preserve a pension-specific tax result.
The measured household context is a 90.1 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $238,700 median owner-occupied home and a $2,983 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $180,000 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $180,000 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Kansas has neither a separately imposed estate tax nor an inheritance tax in the government inventory. The fixed resident $5 million cash estate therefore has zero state transfer tax. This is separate from federal estate tax, probate costs, the income tax on inherited retirement withdrawals and another state’s tax on property located there. State transfer-tax source
- Kansas 2025 individual-income-tax instructions (2025; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
KentuckyRead state analysis
Kentucky
Back to comparison ↑Kentucky’s standard pension exclusion is $31,110 per eligible recipient. With sufficient qualifying income in both names, $62,220 is excluded and $117,780 remains exposed in the example. Special treatment for qualifying older public service is a separate inquiry. The state tax rate determines what that exposure costs; a dollar of excluded income is not a dollar of savings.
The measured household context is a 90.2 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $226,000 median owner-occupied home and a $1,611 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $117,780 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $117,780 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Kentucky’s inheritance tax depends on who receives the property. A spouse, parent, child, grandchild or sibling falls within Class A relief, so this adult-child cash transfer is exempt. Other relatives and unrelated beneficiaries can face graduated tax; the zero example is not a claim that Kentucky abolished inheritance tax. State transfer-tax source
- Kentucky Revenue pension-income exclusion (2026; 2026-09-12)
- Kentucky individual income tax: pension exclusion (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
LouisianaRead state analysis
Louisiana
Back to comparison ↑Louisiana’s enacted age-65 exemption is indexed annually. The Revenue Department’s June 2026 rulemaking example confirms a $12,324 allowance for 2026, consistent with the $12,000 base and 2.7% CPI-U increase. Two eligible recipients exclude $24,648, leaving $155,352 of modeled plan income exposed. The agency example illustrates the statutory adjustment; it is not being presented as a final regulation. Qualifying public retirement systems have separate rules.
The measured household context is a 88.2 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $223,200 median owner-occupied home and a $1,187 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $155,352 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $155,352 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Louisiana has neither a separately imposed estate tax nor an inheritance tax in the government inventory. The fixed resident $5 million cash estate therefore has zero state transfer tax. This is separate from federal estate tax, probate costs, the income tax on inherited retirement withdrawals and another state’s tax on property located there. State transfer-tax source
- Louisiana Revised Statutes 47:44.1 (2026; 2026-09-12)
- Louisiana retirement exemption and annual inflation adjustment (2026; 2026-09-12)
- Louisiana RIB 25-012: individual income-tax reform (2025; 2026-09-12)
- Louisiana Revenue June 2026 rulemaking example: $12,324 indexed exemption (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BLS December 2025 CPI-U release: 2.7% annual increase (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
MaineRead state analysis
Maine
Back to comparison ↑Maine’s pension deduction includes eligible IRA distributions, and Social Security benefits reduce the available allowance. High-income phaseout rules were also amended in 2026. The 2026 maximum deduction is verified at $49,824 per recipient before offsets. The indexed joint phaseout starts at $255,800, calculated from the legally specified historical chained-CPI vintage. At $291,000 federal AGI, the combined allowance is $25,691.90 and $154,308.10 of plan income remains exposed.
The measured household context is a 97.0 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $341,900 median owner-occupied home and a $3,103 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
The verified 2026 maximum is $49,824 per recipient before offsets. Subtracting each spouse’s $30,000 gross Social Security leaves a combined $39,648 before phaseout. The enacted statute uses federal adjusted gross income, and Chapter 662 retains that definition; we follow it instead of the FAQ’s inconsistent Maine-AGI shorthand. The September 15, 2025 BLS vintage preserved by Federal Reserve ALFRED gives June-window averages of 172.3449167 and 176.3495833. Applying their ratio to $250,000 and rounding down to $50 produces $255,800. The $35,200 excess AGI phases out 35.2% of the allowance, leaving $25,691.90. This is Taxstra’s reproducible statutory calculation, not a claimed quotation from an unpublished 2026 pension worksheet.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $154,308.096 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $154,308.096 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Maine’s 2026 exclusion is $7.16 million, with estate rates of 8%, 10% and 12% above successive thresholds. The estate base can include taxable gifts made within one year of death. This cash-only, no-gift example is below the exclusion; that result does not settle the separate annual pension phaseout. State transfer-tax source
- Maine 2026 estimated-tax worksheet, revised July 2026 (2026; 2026-09-12)
- Maine retirement income FAQ, revised April 13, 2026 (2026; 2026-09-12)
- Maine Title 36 section 5122: pension phaseout income base (2025; 2026-09-12)
- Maine enacted Chapter 662, printed text (2026; 2026-09-12)
- Maine sections 5402–5403: chained-CPI vintage and rounding (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BLS chained CPI, September 15, 2025 vintage preserved by Federal Reserve ALFRED (2025; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
MarylandRead state analysis
Maryland
Back to comparison ↑Maryland’s 2026 maximum pension exclusion is $40,600 per eligible person, reduced by gross Social Security. With $30,000 of benefits per spouse, the example can assign $10,600 each to qualifying employer plans, leaving $158,800 of total plan income exposed. Ordinary IRA distributions do not qualify for this pension exclusion. A rollover can therefore change the category even when federal treatment looks similar.
The measured household context is a 105.0 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $436,300 median owner-occupied home and a $4,144 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $158,800 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $158,800 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Maryland retains both taxes: a $5 million estate exclusion and a separate 10% inheritance tax on nonexempt transfers. Children are inheritance-tax exempt, making both taxes zero in this exact example. A transfer to a nonexempt beneficiary can have a different result at the same estate value. Maryland also permits state exclusion portability when election requirements are met. State transfer-tax source
- Maryland Comptroller pension exclusion (2026; 2026-09-12)
- Maryland pension exclusion: 2026 maximum $40,600 (2026; 2026-09-12)
- Maryland seniors and retirees: Social Security offset (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
MassachusettsRead state analysis
Massachusetts
Back to comparison ↑Massachusetts generally taxes the private pension and traditional distributions in this profile while excluding Social Security. Certain public retirement benefits and previously taxed contributions can change a real household’s result. The example assumes no after-tax basis, so it does not manufacture a basis recovery deduction. High investment income and any applicable surtax need their own return calculation.
The measured household context is a 105.8 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $607,400 median owner-occupied home and a $6,080 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $180,000 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $180,000 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Massachusetts requires an estate return above its $2 million filing threshold and reduces the legacy state-death-tax computation by a $99,600 credit. It does not simply tax the excess over $2 million at one rate. Applying the agency table to this $5 million estate produces $292,000 before any special deductions or apportionment. State transfer-tax source
- Massachusetts tax treatment of pensions (2024; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
MichiganRead state analysis
Michigan
Back to comparison ↑Michigan’s retirement deduction phase-in reaches its full 2026 stage. The verified joint private-retirement cap is $135,220; the example has $120,000 of eligible IRA and defined-benefit income, which fits under that cap. Its $60,000 employee-only 401(k) income is excluded from the qualifying pool under the stated funding assumption and remains exposed. Birth-year alternatives and the age-67 standard-deduction option still require comparison on a full return. A headline that the pension tax ended should not be read as an unlimited exclusion at any income.
The measured household context is a 96.2 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $254,200 median owner-occupied home and a $2,988 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
The same employee-only 401(k) assumption is used in Hawaii and Michigan. Michigan’s eligible retirement pool contains the $60,000 IRA and $60,000 defined-benefit pension, which fit under the $135,220 joint ceiling, while the $60,000 unmatched employee 401(k) remains exposed. A plan with employer funding requires an allocation; changing one state’s funding assumption while leaving the other unchanged would defeat the comparison.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $60,000 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $60,000 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Michigan has neither a separately imposed estate tax nor an inheritance tax in the government inventory. The fixed resident $5 million cash estate therefore has zero state transfer tax. This is separate from federal estate tax, probate costs, the income tax on inherited retirement withdrawals and another state’s tax on property located there. State transfer-tax source
- Michigan Revenue Administrative Bulletin 2026-1, January 8, 2026 (2026; 2026-09-12)
- Michigan 2026 withholding guide: retirement deduction limits (2026; 2026-09-12)
- Michigan Revenue Administrative Bulletin 2026-1 (2026; 2026-09-12)
- Michigan withholding guidance for retirees: eligible plan funding (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
MinnesotaRead state analysis
Minnesota
Back to comparison ↑Minnesota’s Social Security subtraction depends on income, and the private plan income in this high-income profile remains broadly exposed. Its healthcare-spending observation is context from all ages and payers, not a Medicare premium forecast. A household attracted by its community and care relationships should compare actual premiums, supplemental coverage and planned distributions rather than rely on one statewide cost number.
The measured household context is a 98.6 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $344,600 median owner-occupied home and a $3,501 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $180,000 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $180,000 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Minnesota subtracts a $3 million exclusion before applying its graduated estate rates. Its 13% first band produces $260,000 for this cash estate. Qualifying farm and small-business interests have additional rules, and recent taxable gifts can be added to the estate base; neither feature is assumed here. State transfer-tax source
- Minnesota Revenue: seniors (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
MississippiRead state analysis
Mississippi
Back to comparison ↑Mississippi can exclude qualifying retirement distributions, including the plans used in this age-67 example. That creates zero exposure for the $180,000 plan-income measure. Premature or nonqualifying distributions require separate treatment, and investment income does not become a retirement distribution merely because the owner has stopped working. Its lower-cost observations should be tested against the desired locality.
The measured household context is a 87.0 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $186,500 median owner-occupied home and a $1,221 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $0 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $0 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Mississippi has neither a separately imposed estate tax nor an inheritance tax in the government inventory. The fixed resident $5 million cash estate therefore has zero state transfer tax. This is separate from federal estate tax, probate costs, the income tax on inherited retirement withdrawals and another state’s tax on property located there. State transfer-tax source
- Mississippi income-tax regulations, Title 35 Part III Chapter 07 (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
MissouriRead state analysis
Missouri
Back to comparison ↑Missouri’s public-pension and Social Security changes should not be confused with its income-limited private-pension deduction. This high-income private-sector profile does not receive that private-pension relief, leaving $180,000 exposed before general deductions. The public versus private distinction is more useful here than describing the entire state as tax-friendly or unfriendly to retirees.
The measured household context is a 90.8 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $254,400 median owner-occupied home and a $2,021 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $180,000 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $180,000 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Missouri has neither a separately imposed estate tax nor an inheritance tax in the government inventory. The fixed resident $5 million cash estate therefore has zero state transfer tax. This is separate from federal estate tax, probate costs, the income tax on inherited retirement withdrawals and another state’s tax on property located there. State transfer-tax source
- Missouri Revenue pension exemption FAQ (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
MontanaRead state analysis
Montana
Back to comparison ↑Montana’s simplified system starts from federal taxable income and has a separate age-65 subtraction. That general age deduction is not a blanket pension exemption and is excluded from this narrow plan-income exposure measure. Its amount is indexed, so an old fixed-dollar summary should not be presented as a verified 2026 figure. Federally taxable Social Security needs attention as well.
The measured household context is a 94.6 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $425,400 median owner-occupied home and a $2,939 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $180,000 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $180,000 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Montana has neither a separately imposed estate tax nor an inheritance tax in the government inventory. The fixed resident $5 million cash estate therefore has zero state transfer tax. This is separate from federal estate tax, probate costs, the income tax on inherited retirement withdrawals and another state’s tax on property located there. State transfer-tax source
- Montana Revenue tax simplification resource hub (2026; 2026-09-12)
- Montana tax simplification: retirement and age deductions (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
NebraskaRead state analysis
Nebraska
Back to comparison ↑Nebraska’s Social Security exclusion does not make traditional IRA and private pension distributions exempt. All $180,000 of this example’s plan income remains exposed before general deductions. Changes in the state’s ordinary income-tax rate affect the eventual bill, so comparing only the existence of an exemption misses another part of the calculation. A low housing cost can still support the household decision.
The measured household context is a 90.1 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $263,100 median owner-occupied home and a $3,739 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $180,000 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $180,000 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Nebraska collects inheritance tax through counties, including on some transfers to children. For a child aged 40, the first $100,000 is exempt and the excess is taxed at 1%, producing $49,000 here. Beneficiaries younger than 22 are exempt. More distant relatives and nonrelatives have different exemptions and rates. State transfer-tax source
- Nebraska 2025 Schedule I adjustments (2025; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
NevadaRead state analysis
Nevada
Back to comparison ↑Nevada has no individual income tax on the example’s retirement distributions. That is a real advantage for plan-income exposure, but it ties several other states rather than establishing a unique winner. The statewide price and insurance observations should be replaced with the chosen home’s budget. A move between very different local markets cannot be evaluated with one median home value.
The measured household context is a 100.0 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $455,500 median owner-occupied home and a $2,143 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $0 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $0 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Nevada has neither a separately imposed estate tax nor an inheritance tax in the government inventory. The fixed resident $5 million cash estate therefore has zero state transfer tax. This is separate from federal estate tax, probate costs, the income tax on inherited retirement withdrawals and another state’s tax on property located there. State transfer-tax source
- Nevada Department of Taxation: income tax in Nevada (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
New HampshireRead state analysis
New Hampshire
Back to comparison ↑New Hampshire’s interest-and-dividends tax repeal applies from 2025, alongside its lack of a broad wage tax. The modeled retirement-plan exposure is zero. Property taxes remain a separate recurring household cost, so an income-tax comparison should not erase the property category. The investment-income repeal also deserves separate recognition from the long-standing treatment of plan distributions.
The measured household context is a 104.2 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $458,800 median owner-occupied home and a $6,707 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $0 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $0 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: New Hampshire has neither a separately imposed estate tax nor an inheritance tax in the government inventory. The fixed resident $5 million cash estate therefore has zero state transfer tax. This is separate from federal estate tax, probate costs, the income tax on inherited retirement withdrawals and another state’s tax on property located there. State transfer-tax source
- New Hampshire DRA: interest-and-dividends repeal (2025; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
New JerseyRead state analysis
New Jersey
Back to comparison ↑New Jersey’s pension exclusion is income-limited; this $300,000 cash-income household is above the relevant eligibility range. Its private plan income remains exposed in the example. State contribution basis may differ from federal basis, but the model assumes none. Retirees should preserve records rather than treat every distribution as fully taxable or fully exempt without checking its history.
The measured household context is a 108.8 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $496,000 median owner-occupied home and a $9,358 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $180,000 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $180,000 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: New Jersey repealed estate tax for deaths beginning January 1, 2018, but kept inheritance tax. A child is Class A and pays no inheritance tax in this example. A sibling or unrelated heir can face a different rate and exemption; the repeal of one tax did not repeal the other. State transfer-tax source
- New Jersey Division of Taxation: retirement income (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
New MexicoRead state analysis
New Mexico
Back to comparison ↑New Mexico’s retirement and Social Security relief includes income tests. The high-income example does not assume those benefits shelter its private plan distributions. Housing and general prices may support a lower household budget, but that is a separate reason for a favorable score. A withdrawal or conversion year should be projected using the current filing-status thresholds.
The measured household context is a 92.2 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $279,900 median owner-occupied home and a $1,776 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $180,000 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $180,000 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: New Mexico has neither a separately imposed estate tax nor an inheritance tax in the government inventory. The fixed resident $5 million cash estate therefore has zero state transfer tax. This is separate from federal estate tax, probate costs, the income tax on inherited retirement withdrawals and another state’s tax on property located there. State transfer-tax source
- New Mexico personal-income-tax overview (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
New YorkRead state analysis
New York
Back to comparison ↑New York excludes up to $20,000 of qualifying private pension and annuity income per person at the required age. Each modeled spouse qualifies, so $40,000 is assigned against plan income and $140,000 remains exposed. Government pensions have separate treatment. New York City or Yonkers residency also belongs in the full tax projection; the private-pension exclusion is not a combined state/local tax estimate.
The measured household context is a 107.9 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $449,800 median owner-occupied home and a $6,542 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $140,000 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $140,000 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: New York’s 2026 basic exclusion is $7.35 million. The fixed $5 million estate is below it. Larger estates need the state’s applicable-credit calculation and gift-inclusion rules; the headline exclusion alone is not a complete tax formula. Owning New York real or tangible property can also create filing exposure for a nonresident estate. State transfer-tax source
- New York tax information for seniors (2026; 2026-09-12)
- New York tax information for seniors (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
North CarolinaRead state analysis
North Carolina
Back to comparison ↑North Carolina’s special treatment for qualifying vested government retirement benefits is not a general private-pension exclusion. The example deliberately uses a private pension and traditional accounts, leaving $180,000 exposed before general deductions. Military retirement is another separate category. A retiree who qualifies for one of those exceptions needs an individualized comparison instead of importing this profile unchanged.
The measured household context is a 94.3 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $333,000 median owner-occupied home and a $2,044 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $180,000 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $180,000 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: North Carolina has neither a separately imposed estate tax nor an inheritance tax in the government inventory. The fixed resident $5 million cash estate therefore has zero state transfer tax. This is separate from federal estate tax, probate costs, the income tax on inherited retirement withdrawals and another state’s tax on property located there. State transfer-tax source
- North Carolina Bailey retirement-benefit guidance (2025; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
North DakotaRead state analysis
North Dakota
Back to comparison ↑North Dakota exempts Social Security but generally includes traditional accounts and private pensions. The plan-income exposure therefore matches several states with much different rates and living costs. This demonstrates why exposure is only one financial category. Personal tolerance for the location and the specific community belongs in the decision, even where the cost observations look favorable.
The measured household context is a 89.0 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $266,100 median owner-occupied home and a $2,550 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $180,000 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $180,000 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: North Dakota has neither a separately imposed estate tax nor an inheritance tax in the government inventory. The fixed resident $5 million cash estate therefore has zero state transfer tax. This is separate from federal estate tax, probate costs, the income tax on inherited retirement withdrawals and another state’s tax on property located there. State transfer-tax source
- North Dakota 2025 income-tax instructions (2025; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
OhioRead state analysis
Ohio
Back to comparison ↑Ohio’s retirement-income credits are subject to eligibility and income limits. This high-income example does not turn those limited credits into a pension exclusion, so its $180,000 plan exposure remains intact. Social Security is separate, and local tax treatment requires income-specific review. A municipal wage-tax rate should not be blindly applied to retirement distributions.
The measured household context is a 92.8 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $239,800 median owner-occupied home and a $2,937 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $180,000 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $180,000 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Ohio has neither a separately imposed estate tax nor an inheritance tax in the government inventory. The fixed resident $5 million cash estate therefore has zero state transfer tax. This is separate from federal estate tax, probate costs, the income tax on inherited retirement withdrawals and another state’s tax on property located there. State transfer-tax source
- Ohio Revised Code 5747.055 (2019; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
OklahomaRead state analysis
Oklahoma
Back to comparison ↑Oklahoma permits an exclusion of up to $10,000 per person from eligible retirement plans, including the qualified account categories used here. With income split evenly, the example excludes $20,000 and leaves $160,000 exposed. Public-system exclusions cannot be stacked repeatedly to exceed the shared limit for the same person. Military and qualifying CSRS benefits follow separate provisions.
The measured household context is a 87.8 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $222,100 median owner-occupied home and a $1,672 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $160,000 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $160,000 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Oklahoma has neither a separately imposed estate tax nor an inheritance tax in the government inventory. The fixed resident $5 million cash estate therefore has zero state transfer tax. This is separate from federal estate tax, probate costs, the income tax on inherited retirement withdrawals and another state’s tax on property located there. State transfer-tax source
- Oklahoma Tax Commission: other retirement income (2026; 2026-09-12)
- Oklahoma retirement income exclusions (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
OregonRead state analysis
Oregon
Back to comparison ↑Oregon generally includes this profile’s private pension and traditional distributions while excluding Social Security. A limited retirement credit is not modeled as an exclusion for this high-income household. Local income taxes can depend on the particular jurisdiction and income level, so the state return is only one part of a Portland-area comparison. The statewide lifestyle grade cannot substitute for that address-level review.
The measured household context is a 103.4 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $497,500 median owner-occupied home and a $3,895 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
Oregon’s estate-transfer filing threshold is another consideration for an asset-rich retiree. Its Revenue Department identifies a $1 million gross-estate threshold when the estate has property taxable by Oregon. That is a filing rule, not a statement that the tax equals the value over $1 million. A home and accumulated retirement assets should be reviewed alongside annual distributions and the estate’s deductions.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $180,000 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $180,000 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Oregon’s estate tax reaches estates far below the federal threshold: filing generally starts at $1 million with Oregon-taxable property. Its statutory rate schedule gives $425,000 on the $5 million cash estate. The beneficiary’s status as a child does not eliminate this estate-level tax, and special marital or other deductions require their own facts. State transfer-tax source
- Oregon Revenue personal-income-tax guidance (2026; 2026-09-12)
- Oregon estate-transfer-tax guidance (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
PennsylvaniaRead state analysis
Pennsylvania
Back to comparison ↑Pennsylvania excludes qualifying retirement benefits received under the applicable retirement rules, including the modeled age-67 pension and traditional plans. The plan-income exposure is zero. That does not make brokerage interest, dividends or every gain tax-free, and inheritance-tax questions belong in a separate estate review. Retirement cash flow and the cost of leaving assets to beneficiaries are different comparisons.
The measured household context is a 97.6 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $277,600 median owner-occupied home and a $3,214 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
Pennsylvania’s eligible retirement-income exclusion does not eliminate its inheritance tax. The rate depends on the beneficiary: the Revenue Department lists 4.5% for adult lineal heirs, 12% for siblings and 15% for other nonexempt heirs, with a spouse exemption and other specified exceptions. Beneficiary designations and the nature of the transferred asset deserve a separate review from the annual 1099-R.
For everyday spending, Pennsylvania lists a 6% general sales and use tax, with a further 1% in Allegheny County and 2% in Philadelphia. Exempt items and the local destination still matter. These rates describe taxable purchases, not a tax on the entire retirement spending budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $0 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $0 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Pennsylvania’s eligible retirement-income exemption does not make inherited wealth tax-free. A $5 million cash transfer to a child aged 40 creates $225,000 of inheritance tax at 4.5% before discounts. The comparable rates are 0% for a spouse, 12% for siblings and 15% for other nonexempt heirs. Asset-specific exemptions and early-payment discounts can change a real estate’s result. State transfer-tax source
- Pennsylvania personal-income-tax guide: gross compensation (2026; 2026-09-12)
- Pennsylvania Revenue official tax-rate table (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
Rhode IslandRead state analysis
Rhode Island
Back to comparison ↑Rhode Island’s pension modification depends on age and income. The exact indexed 2026 threshold is not asserted here. The fixed household’s $291,000 federal AGI is nevertheless conclusively ineligible: the agency’s $133,750 prior-year joint threshold, the enacted inflation mechanism and BLS observations place even a deliberately generous 2026 upper bound at $141,350. All $180,000 of this profile’s plan income therefore remains exposed. That bound is an eligibility proof for this household, not a replacement threshold for other taxpayers.
The measured household context is a 102.3 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $455,700 median owner-occupied home and a $4,886 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
Rhode Island’s 2026 estate-tax advisory sets a $1,838,056 net taxable estate threshold. It is independent of the income-tested pension modification, and marital deductions and other estate rules can affect the result. Compare annual withdrawal treatment and the projected taxable estate separately rather than treating one favorable deduction as a complete retirement-tax answer.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $180,000 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $180,000 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Rhode Island’s 2026 credit is $87,940, corresponding to a $1,838,056 estate threshold. Form RI-706 separately subtracts $60,000, applies its rate table, then subtracts the credit. This produces $303,660 for the fixed estate. Treating the headline threshold as a deduction from every estate would misstate the calculation. State transfer-tax source
- Rhode Island retirement-income guide, issued February 2026 for tax year 2025 (2026; 2026-09-12)
- Rhode Island ADV 2025-27: 2026 estate threshold (2025; 2026-09-12)
- Rhode Island enacted H7127Aaa, June 12, 2026: Article 6 pension income test (2026; 2026-09-12)
- Rhode Island ADV2025-22: 2025 joint pension income ceiling (2025; 2026-09-12)
- BLS CPI-U public series: September 2023–August 2025 (2025; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
South CarolinaRead state analysis
South Carolina
Back to comparison ↑South Carolina allows a retirement deduction of up to $10,000 per age-65 recipient. The example assigns $20,000 to plans and shows $160,000 exposed. Its separate age-65 deduction is reduced by the retirement deduction already claimed; it is not an additional unrestricted $15,000 on top. The remaining general age relief is outside this narrow plan-income measure.
The measured household context is a 93.7 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $299,500 median owner-occupied home and a $1,337 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $160,000 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $160,000 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: South Carolina has neither a separately imposed estate tax nor an inheritance tax in the government inventory. The fixed resident $5 million cash estate therefore has zero state transfer tax. This is separate from federal estate tax, probate costs, the income tax on inherited retirement withdrawals and another state’s tax on property located there. State transfer-tax source
- South Carolina income-tax FAQs (2026; 2026-09-12)
- South Carolina individual income tax FAQ (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
South DakotaRead state analysis
South Dakota
Back to comparison ↑South Dakota does not impose an individual income tax on the modeled retirement distributions, producing zero plan-income exposure. Its overall household position can still differ from another zero-tax state because prices, housing and livability differ. The guide does not award a unique tax rank to break that genuine tie. Personal proximity to family and providers should be tested independently.
The measured household context is a 88.6 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $289,600 median owner-occupied home and a $2,940 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $0 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $0 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: South Dakota has neither a separately imposed estate tax nor an inheritance tax in the government inventory. The fixed resident $5 million cash estate therefore has zero state transfer tax. This is separate from federal estate tax, probate costs, the income tax on inherited retirement withdrawals and another state’s tax on property located there. State transfer-tax source
- South Dakota Revenue sales/use tax guide (2022; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
TennesseeRead state analysis
Tennessee
Back to comparison ↑Tennessee’s former Hall tax no longer applies, and the modeled plan distributions face no individual income tax. The plan-exposure score is therefore tied with other zero states. A retiree still pays for housing, insurance and taxable purchases; the correct comparison uses a full annual budget. Nashville-area and smaller-community costs should not be assumed to match a statewide median.
The measured household context is a 91.9 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $332,600 median owner-occupied home and a $1,488 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $0 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $0 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Tennessee has neither a separately imposed estate tax nor an inheritance tax in the government inventory. The fixed resident $5 million cash estate therefore has zero state transfer tax. This is separate from federal estate tax, probate costs, the income tax on inherited retirement withdrawals and another state’s tax on property located there. State transfer-tax source
- Tennessee Revenue: Hall income-tax repeal (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
TexasRead state analysis
Texas
Back to comparison ↑Texas has no individual income tax on the modeled plan distributions. Property carrying costs remain visible in the retirement household score because an income-tax advantage does not eliminate a home’s annual bill. Exemptions, assessments, insurance and maintenance should be quoted for the actual property. A large house can make a zero-income-tax move more expensive than a smaller home elsewhere.
The measured household context is a 97.1 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $313,200 median owner-occupied home and a $4,108 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $0 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $0 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Texas has neither a separately imposed estate tax nor an inheritance tax in the government inventory. The fixed resident $5 million cash estate therefore has zero state transfer tax. This is separate from federal estate tax, probate costs, the income tax on inherited retirement withdrawals and another state’s tax on property located there. State transfer-tax source
- Texas Constitution Article VIII, section 24-a (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
UtahRead state analysis
Utah
Back to comparison ↑Utah’s retirement and Social Security credits are income-sensitive. This high-income private-sector profile does not assume those credits eliminate plan income, leaving $180,000 exposed before general deductions and any credit calculation. Its ordinary tax rate is a separate input. A retiree attracted to the state’s lifestyle should compare actual after-tax distributions and housing rather than treat the exposure score as a verdict.
The measured household context is a 98.9 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $545,200 median owner-occupied home and a $2,648 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $180,000 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $180,000 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Utah has neither a separately imposed estate tax nor an inheritance tax in the government inventory. The fixed resident $5 million cash estate therefore has zero state transfer tax. This is separate from federal estate tax, probate costs, the income tax on inherited retirement withdrawals and another state’s tax on property located there. State transfer-tax source
- Utah TC-40A supplemental schedule instructions (2025; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
VermontRead state analysis
Vermont
Back to comparison ↑Vermont’s Social Security and eligible retirement relief depends on income and benefit category. The high-income example cannot assume those exclusions shelter its private plans. Housing, healthcare arrangements and lifestyle can still drive a reasonable Vermont decision. The relevant planning question is the cost of the desired life after the correct income tests, not whether a state has any retirement provision at all.
The measured household context is a 98.0 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $352,800 median owner-occupied home and a $5,026 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $180,000 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $180,000 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Vermont taxes estate value above $5 million at 16%, with relevant taxable gifts made within two years included. The fixed estate equals the threshold, so tax is zero. Legislation effective June 18, 2026 also aligned the state filing threshold with $5 million; older material may still describe the prior filing rule. State transfer-tax source
- Vermont statutes, Title 32 chapter 151, section 5830e (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
VirginiaRead state analysis
Virginia
Back to comparison ↑Virginia provides age-related relief subject to rules and income limits, rather than a blanket exemption for this private plan profile. The narrow measure shows all $180,000 exposed before general deductions. Social Security and military benefits require their own classifications. Comparing Northern Virginia with another Virginia locality also calls for a housing and transportation budget, not just a common statewide rate.
The measured household context is a 101.1 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $403,500 median owner-occupied home and a $2,872 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $180,000 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $180,000 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Virginia has neither a separately imposed estate tax nor an inheritance tax in the government inventory. The fixed resident $5 million cash estate therefore has zero state transfer tax. This is separate from federal estate tax, probate costs, the income tax on inherited retirement withdrawals and another state’s tax on property located there. State transfer-tax source
- Virginia Tax: subtractions (2025; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
WashingtonRead state analysis
Washington
Back to comparison ↑Washington has no broad individual income tax on the modeled 2026 plan distributions. Its separate capital-gains regime and enacted future income-tax changes should not be confused with current pension taxation. The guide’s $180,000 plan measure is zero for 2026; a multiyear plan needs a separate review of future effective dates and investment transactions. Home and insurance costs remain independent.
The measured household context is a 107.0 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $602,200 median owner-occupied home and a $4,729 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $0 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $0 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Washington’s date of death matters in 2026. January–June used a $3.076 million exclusion and rates reaching 35%; July 1 onward uses a $3 million exclusion and rates of 10%–20%. The September 12 fixed estate uses the later schedule, producing $240,000. Its lack of a general individual income tax does not eliminate this estate tax. State transfer-tax source
- Washington Revenue capital-gains FAQ (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
West VirginiaRead state analysis
West Virginia
Back to comparison ↑West Virginia completes its Social Security exclusion in 2026, regardless of income. That is a meaningful change from the earlier partial phase-in, but it does not exempt the example’s private pension and traditional plans. The age-based modification interacts with other subtractions and should not be counted twice. Our plan-exposure measure remains $180,000 before general age deductions.
The measured household context is a 89.5 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $170,800 median owner-occupied home and a $881 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $180,000 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $180,000 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: West Virginia has neither a separately imposed estate tax nor an inheritance tax in the government inventory. The fixed resident $5 million cash estate therefore has zero state transfer tax. This is separate from federal estate tax, probate costs, the income tax on inherited retirement withdrawals and another state’s tax on property located there. State transfer-tax source
- West Virginia senior-citizen Social Security modification (2026; 2026-09-12)
- West Virginia Social Security modification: full exemption in 2026 (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
WisconsinRead state analysis
Wisconsin
Back to comparison ↑Wisconsin’s newer age-67 retirement exclusion can reach $24,000 per qualifying person. Both modeled spouses qualify and own eligible income, so the joint $48,000 exclusion leaves $132,000 of plan income exposed. The rule should not be confused with older income-limited retirement relief. The full joint amount requires both spouses to meet the age requirement.
The measured household context is a 94.1 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $294,700 median owner-occupied home and a $3,680 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
Wisconsin’s age-67 subtraction also comes with a return-level tradeoff: taxpayers electing it cannot claim credits on that return. The plan-income exposure measure applies the $48,000 joint subtraction because it is comparing an income base. A complete Wisconsin tax return must still evaluate whether electing the subtraction is preferable to the otherwise available credits.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $132,000 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $132,000 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Wisconsin has neither a separately imposed estate tax nor an inheritance tax in the government inventory. The fixed resident $5 million cash estate therefore has zero state transfer tax. This is separate from federal estate tax, probate costs, the income tax on inherited retirement withdrawals and another state’s tax on property located there. State transfer-tax source
- Wisconsin Revenue retired-person FAQ (2026; 2026-09-12)
- Wisconsin retirement income FAQ (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
WyomingRead state analysis
Wyoming
Back to comparison ↑Wyoming has no individual income tax on the modeled retirement distributions, placing it in the zero-exposure tie. Whether it is a good retirement destination then depends on the household’s community, housing, travel and healthcare arrangements. A state average cannot capture the cost difference between a high-demand resort location and another community. The guide keeps those practical choices separate from the tax fact.
The measured household context is a 92.7 regional price index (U.S. = 100), a $339,500 median owner-occupied home and a $1,947 median annual homeowner property-tax bill. Those observations describe different households; they are not a quotation for one property. Medicare choices, travel and the actual home belong in the final budget.
In the controlled two-spouse profile, $0 of $180,000 qualified plan income remains exposed before general deductions and rates. This is an income-base comparison, not a $0 tax bill.
Estate and inheritance tax: Wyoming has neither a separately imposed estate tax nor an inheritance tax in the government inventory. The fixed resident $5 million cash estate therefore has zero state transfer tax. This is separate from federal estate tax, probate costs, the income tax on inherited retirement withdrawals and another state’s tax on property located there. State transfer-tax source
- Wyoming government: about Wyoming (2026; 2026-09-12)
- BEA regional price parities, via FRED (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064 (2024; retrieved 2026-09-12)
- Census ACS housing, rent and property-tax data
- NAIC 2023 homeowner premium table
Taxstra methodologyScoring factors, weights, research profiles and limitations.
How Taxstra grades each state out of 10
We score every state using the same rules. Costs and financial factors make up 80% of the overall score, and WalletHub’s Quality of Life category makes up 20%. Each category tile shows how much it counts. Tiles marked “Not in overall score” offer extra context without changing the ranking.
What counts toward the score
- Retirement income subject to tax: 35% of the financial share
- Everyday living costs: 25% of the financial share
- Homeowner property taxes: 15% of the financial share
- Home insurance costs: 5% of the financial share
- State tax on a $5 million estate: 20% of the financial share
What does a score out of 10 mean?
For financial categories, 10 is the strongest result in the comparison and 1 is the weakest. Lower costs generally score better; higher pay scores better. A 7.9 is a comparison tool, not a promise about your finances.
Why can scores and ranks look different?
Cards show one decimal place, while rankings use two. Two states can both display 7.9 and still have slightly different ranks. States with the same ranking value share a rank.
Which WalletHub ranking do we use?
We use WalletHub’s Quality of Life category, not its overall ranking. For example, Illinois is fifth for Quality of Life and eighteenth overall in the cited study. Those are two different measures.
What if information is missing?
We leave it missing instead of guessing. If a required factor is unavailable, we label the score provisional and do not give it an overall rank.
Technical formulas and source definitions
Annual plan-income exposure is not tax due. A separate $5 million resident cash estate passing to one child aged 40 supplies the estate/inheritance-tax factor; it is not an annual cost or an assumption that every retiree owns $5 million. Rates, general deductions, credits, investment taxes, sales taxes and personalized healthcare costs remain separate.
- Financial categories: actual measurement spread
- The most favorable observed value receives 10 and the least favorable receives 1. Intermediate grades are scaled linearly between them: 1 + 9 × the favorable share of the observed range. Lower costs score higher; higher pay scores higher. If every observation is identical, each receives 5.5. These relative grades do not have a universal pass/fail cutoff. Extreme observations can widen the range and compress other grades. We do not narrow a genuine gap just to produce a tighter leaderboard; a change to a source population must have a documented measurement reason. The STR grade is a regional spending-cost screen. Hotel employment is excluded from its score because hotel jobs do not measure residential STR demand; actual occupancy and booking revenue require local property research.
- Malpractice and rental taxes: defined samples
- The physician index weights CMS county malpractice-cost observations by their malpractice RVUs within each state. It uses the underlying 2026 update, based on 2023 premiums and RVUs, before Medicare payment adjustments. State-specific specialty mix, missing insurer types and CMS imputation limit its use as a quote comparison. Apartment-tax comparisons hold building and fixture values constant and average the study’s named urban and rural municipalities equally. Including both reduces dependence on one city; it still does not represent all localities. They are neither statewide tax rates nor single-family STR bills.
- Quality of life: the source category, not the overall WalletHub rank
- We use the quality-of-life category of WalletHub’s 2026 state study, published August 10, 2026. Taxstra converts its rank to a grade using 1 + 9 × (50 − rank) / 49. The publisher’s category includes amenities, mobility, leisure, weather and environmental conditions. WalletHub’s overall ranking also includes affordability, economy, education and health, and safety. We use its narrower quality-of-life category as an amenities and daily-life input; our financial factors already measure costs separately. For example, Illinois is #5 in that category and #18 overall in WalletHub. Taxstra’s own guide ranking is a third, separately calculated result. Differences in these rank-based grades are not measured differences in happiness.
- Overall grade and rank
- Multiply each unrounded component grade by its published weight, add the results, then display one decimal place. Round the composite to two decimals for ranking and retain genuine ties at that precision. Cards display one decimal for readability; two cards displaying 7.9 can therefore have different positions. The table tooltip and downloadable dataset include the ranking value. For example, financial 6.0 and quality of life 9.0 produce 6.6 at 80% financial / 20% quality-of-life weights. Direct tax and deduction comparisons rank their displayed dollar outcomes and show a separate normalized category grade.
- Incomplete evidence
- Unavailable category data receives no grade. When a weighted component is missing, the remaining components are reweighted and the card labels the result provisional, shows evidence coverage and excludes it from the overall rank. The presence of a numeric provisional grade is not evidence that the missing category was measured.
- What a grade does not claim
- These are screening grades, not completed all-factor tax or legal rankings. The named tax benchmarks and CMS malpractice-cost index are included only where the displayed weights say so. Full-return taxes, individual insurance quotes and legal-policy judgments remain separate. A high amenities grade does not mean that everyone prefers the state. Family ties, local neighborhoods, climate preferences and a particular job can outweigh statewide observations.
For investment guides, livability describes market context; it does not forecast rent growth or returns and does not assume that the investor lives in the property’s state. In guides about tax bills, the tax calculations stay separate from lifestyle grades.
Research examples and calculation assumptions
Taxstra's research profiles
A useful comparison holds the household and property constant. These are the exact starting profiles for the tax research; a scenario is not a completed tax estimate unless its result is explicitly shown.
- Physician employment
- $500,000 in wages, one earner, no dependents, no elective retirement contributions. Married filing jointly and single results are separate. The score’s separate tax sensitivity uses $500,000 of state taxable wage income with state AGI equal to that base; it is not a gross-to-taxable return calculation. Compensation observations use the BLS occupation specified beside the result and exclude self-employment.
- Contracting and business ownership
- $500,000 of profit before owner compensation. An S-corp example tests a $250,000 owner wage; that is a sensitivity assumption, not a reasonable-compensation opinion. The separate employee-payroll example is five employees at $100,000 each. Employee wages already included in operating expenses are never deducted twice.
- Retirement
- Both spouses are 67, married filing jointly, receiving $120,000 from traditional retirement accounts, $60,000 in private pensions, $60,000 in Social Security, $30,000 in ordinary investment income and $30,000 in long-term capital gains. Each spouse receives half. Total cash income is $300,000; taxable income depends on the income category and applicable rules. Full-year residents. Qualified traditional distributions; employer-funded defined-benefit pension; 401(k) entirely employee elective deferrals with no employer contributions; IRA entirely self-funded with no exempt pension rollover; Pennsylvania-eligible retirement distributions after retirement. Exclusions are applied to qualifying plan income first where several income categories are eligible. No federal or state tax bill is estimated.
- Property acquisition
- A debt-free $1 million purchase, with $200,000 allocated to land. The long-term rental example assumes $90,000 of rent and $30,000 of expenses before property tax, insurance and depreciation. The STR example assumes $150,000 of bookings and $75,000 of expenses on the same basis. These are research starting profiles, not market forecasts. The standardized scored apartment example is different: $600,000 land and building plus $30,000 fixtures, with the same values across named municipalities. The STR worked example uses a separately labeled fixed property scenario. It does not change the statewide ranking or represent forecast bookings.
- Depreciation
- A sensitivity considers an additional $100,000 deduction that the taxpayer can currently use. An addback can defer a state benefit even when federal expensing is available. A current deduction, a future recovery and a permanent tax reduction are different results.
- State and local scope
- Property location and owner residence are separate inputs. There is no assumed “average” local income tax. A combined state/local result needs a named locality and its resident or nonresident rules. Figures explicitly labeled state-only exclude local tax.
How to reproduce a comparison
- Choose the named measure and its source year.
- Apply the formula displayed beside the map to the source observation for each state.
- Round money to whole dollars, ratios to two decimal places and grades to one decimal place. Rank in the direction stated by the measure: the tax-penalty guide places the largest burden first, while its tax-cost grade still rewards a lower bill. Changing display order does not change a state’s rank.
- Give equal ranking values the same competition rank (composites use two decimals; cards show one). After a tie, skip the occupied positions.
- Leave suppressed or unavailable observations unranked. Retain the state in the table and describe the gap.
A price-adjusted wage, a homeowner tax bill and a lodging-employment concentration answer different questions. The balanced view explicitly combines the guide’s named financial factors with livability at the displayed weights. Other categories provide context. A favorable legal policy is not treated as a measured dollar saving. Material modeling assumptions require review before a full financial ranking is released.
The financial profiles are a $500,000 W-2 household, a business with $500,000 profit before owner compensation, a five-person $500,000 payroll, and a married age-67 household with $300,000 of mixed retirement and investment income. Investor examples assume the purchase location is separate from the owner’s residence.
These scenarios define the research questions. Unless a completed calculation is explicitly shown, a profile is not an estimated return. Tax sensitivities use separately supplied state-taxable wage or ordinary-business bases, exclude local tax and do not replace full-return calculations. We do not calculate with unverified secondary-source schedules.
Published survey estimates have sampling error. We preserve available Census margins of error and BLS relative errors in the source data. Small apparent differences should not be treated as certainty. A comprehensive state decision still requires the actual locality, household, property, employer and coverage terms.
Sources and measurement datesOriginal datasets, primary authority, verification dates and downloadable research.
Download the published 50-state dataset (CSV) · Dataset definitions and coverage
Economic observations were retrieved September 12, 2026. Measurement years differ because the agencies publish on different schedules. Existing retirement rules retain their August 4, 2026 review date; existing PTET and depreciation research retain August 30, 2026. Unresolved entries remain identified.
- Taxstra controlled retirement profile and calculation methodologySource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Retirement-income rule only; not verification of every rate or example on the linked page.
- Illinois Attorney General estate-tax instructions for 2023–2026Source year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
$4 million exclusion, adjusted taxable gifts and no Illinois portability; not a simplified marginal-tax formula.
- Pennsylvania Revenue official tax-rate tableSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Inheritance rates by beneficiary relationship and general sales/use rates with local additions.
- Iowa inheritance-tax guidanceSource year / applicable rules: 2025 · Verified 2026-09-12
No Iowa inheritance tax for deaths on or after January 1, 2025.
- Oregon estate-transfer-tax guidanceSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
$1 million gross-estate filing threshold and Oregon property connection; filing threshold is not an estimated tax bill.
- Illinois FY 2026-11: grocery occupation tax changesSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
State 1% grocery tax ended January 1, 2026; authorized local grocery tax and specified transit taxes can remain.
- CMS 2026 Medicare premiums and deductiblesSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
National Part B base monthly premium $202.90 and annual deductible $283; income adjustments are additional.
- Medicare special enrollment periods when movingSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Moving outside a plan service area can permit changing Medicare Advantage or drug coverage; destination-specific plan review needed.
- Medicare Plan CompareSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Compare local Medicare plans, drugs and coverage; not a statewide affordability grade.
- Alabama enrolled HB341, section 40-18-19(a)(6) and (13)Source year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Defined-benefit exemption and $6,000 age-65 retirement exclusion; the new National Guard provision starts in 2027.
Defined-benefit exemption and $6,000 age-65 retirement exclusion; the new National Guard provision starts in 2027.
- Alabama 2026 enrolled HB341: retirement exclusions, pages 3 and 6Source year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Retirement-income rule only; not verification of every rate or example on the linked page.
- BEA regional price parities, via FREDSource year / applicable rules: 2024 · Retrieved 2026-09-12
- Census ACS 1-year: B25077, B25103, B25064Source year / applicable rules: 2024 · Retrieved 2026-09-12
- NAIC homeowners report, HO-3 average premiumsSource year / applicable rules: 2023 · Retrieved 2026-09-12
- Minnesota House Research: national estate and inheritance tax inventory, November 2025Source year / applicable rules: 2025 · Verified 2026-09-12
- WalletHub 2026 quality-of-life categorySource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Retrieved 2026-09-12
The Quality of Life Rank column, not Overall Rank. Overall also includes affordability, economy, education and health, and safety. Illinois is #5 in the quality-of-life category and #18 overall. Category ranks are converted to Taxstra grades; overall ranks are shown only for source context.
- Alaska Court System: tax mattersSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Alaska has no individual income tax; unrelated federal estate figures on this page are not used.
Alaska has no individual income tax; unrelated federal estate figures on this page are not used.
- Arizona Revised Statutes 43-1022Source year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Subtractions identify specified government pension systems, not the modeled private plans; Social Security subtraction.
Subtractions identify specified government pension systems, not the modeled private plans; Social Security subtraction.
- Arkansas Revenue Subject 206: pensions and annuitiesSource year / applicable rules: 2023 · Verified 2026-09-12
$6,000 retirement exclusion per recipient and eligible IRA distributions at age 59½; revised February 24, 2023.
$6,000 retirement exclusion per recipient and eligible IRA distributions at age 59½; revised February 24, 2023.
- California FTB Publication 1005: pension and annuity guidelinesSource year / applicable rules: 2025 · Verified 2026-09-12
Pages 4–7: resident traditional-plan income, basis differences and Social Security; excludes special military rules from this private profile.
Pages 4–7: resident traditional-plan income, basis differences and Social Security; excludes special military rules from this private profile.
- Colorado 2025 income-tax filing guide, DR0104AD instructionsSource year / applicable rules: 2025 · Verified 2026-09-12
Age-65 $24,000 pension allowance is reduced by the Social Security subtraction; each modeled spouse already subtracts $25,500.
Age-65 $24,000 pension allowance is reduced by the Social Security subtraction; each modeled spouse already subtracts $25,500.
- Colorado: Social Security, pensions and annuitiesSource year / applicable rules: 2025 · Verified 2026-09-12
Retirement-income rule only; not verification of every rate or example on the linked page.
- Connecticut DRS senior-citizen tax guidanceSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Income-sensitive pension and IRA relief does not extend to $291,000 joint federal AGI.
Income-sensitive pension and IRA relief does not extend to $291,000 joint federal AGI.
- Connecticut tax tips for senior citizensSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Retirement-income rule only; not verification of every rate or example on the linked page.
- Connecticut DRS: 2026 estate and gift tax informationSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
- Delaware Code Title 30, section 1106Source year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Age-60 $12,500 allowance per recipient shared across eligible retirement and investment income.
Age-60 $12,500 allowance per recipient shared across eligible retirement and investment income.
- Florida Revenue: personal income tax FAQSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Florida does not have a personal income tax.
Florida does not have a personal income tax.
- Georgia Revenue retirement-income exclusionSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Age-65 $65,000 exclusion per recipient and qualifying income categories.
Age-65 $65,000 exclusion per recipient and qualifying income categories.
- Georgia retirement income exclusionSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Retirement-income rule only; not verification of every rate or example on the linked page.
- Hawaii TIR 96-5, August 14, 1996: continuing pension-funding guidanceSource year / applicable rules: 1996 · Verified 2026-09-12
Pages 1–4 distinguish employee elective contributions, employer contributions and exempt-pension rollovers; model assumes no employer 401(k) contributions and no exempt IRA rollover.
Pages 1–4 distinguish employee elective contributions, employer contributions and exempt-pension rollovers; model assumes no employer 401(k) contributions and no exempt IRA rollover.
- Hawaii Department of Taxation: current Form M-6 instructionsSource year / applicable rules: 2024 · Verified 2026-09-12
- Idaho Retirement Benefits DeductionSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Deduction requires the listed qualifying public retirement benefits; private-plan profile does not qualify.
Deduction requires the listed qualifying public retirement benefits; private-plan profile does not qualify.
- Illinois Publication 120: retirement incomeSource year / applicable rules: 2025 · Verified 2026-09-12
December 2025 publication covers qualifying IRA and employee-plan income; brokerage income is separate.
December 2025 publication covers qualifying IRA and employee-plan income; brokerage income is separate.
- Illinois Publication 120: retirement incomeSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Retirement-income rule only; not verification of every rate or example on the linked page.
- Illinois Attorney General: 2023–2026 instructions and worked estate examplesSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
- Indiana Revenue individual deductionsSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Listed civil-service and military deductions do not apply to the private-plan profile.
Listed civil-service and military deductions do not apply to the private-plan profile.
- Iowa retirement-income tax guidanceSource year / applicable rules: 2025 · Verified 2026-09-12
March 13, 2025 guidance: qualifying retirement-income exclusion at age 55, effective from tax year 2023.
March 13, 2025 guidance: qualifying retirement-income exclusion at age 55, effective from tax year 2023.
- Iowa Schedule 1: retirement income exclusionSource year / applicable rules: 2025 · Verified 2026-09-12
Retirement-income rule only; not verification of every rate or example on the linked page.
- Iowa Revenue: inheritance repeal effective January 1, 2025Source year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
- Kansas 2025 individual-income-tax instructionsSource year / applicable rules: 2025 · Verified 2026-09-12
Specified government retirement subtractions and Social Security; no general private-plan subtraction.
Specified government retirement subtractions and Social Security; no general private-plan subtraction.
- Kentucky Revenue pension-income exclusionSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
$31,110 standard pension exclusion; other statements on this mixed-year page, including its displayed rate, are not adopted.
$31,110 standard pension exclusion; other statements on this mixed-year page, including its displayed rate, are not adopted.
- Kentucky individual income tax: pension exclusionSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Retirement-income rule only; not verification of every rate or example on the linked page.
- Kentucky Revenue: exempt heirs and inheritance classesSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
- Louisiana Revised Statutes 47:44.1Source year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Statutory CPI-U indexing begins in 2026. The agency June 2026 rulemaking example confirms $12,324 per eligible recipient.
Statutory CPI-U indexing begins in 2026. The agency June 2026 rulemaking example confirms $12,324 per eligible recipient.
- Louisiana retirement exemption and annual inflation adjustmentSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Retirement-income rule only; not verification of every rate or example on the linked page.
- Louisiana RIB 25-012: individual income-tax reformSource year / applicable rules: 2025 · Verified 2026-09-12
Page 3 confirms retirement-exemption indexing beginning in 2026; no final indexed 2026 amount supplied.
- Louisiana Revenue June 2026 rulemaking example: $12,324 indexed exemptionSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Pages 2 and 4 give the indexed 2026 amount. This proposed rule illustrates an already enacted statutory adjustment; it is not represented as a final regulation.
- BLS December 2025 CPI-U release: 2.7% annual increaseSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Retirement-income rule only; not verification of every rate or example on the linked page.
- Maine 2026 estimated-tax worksheet, revised July 2026Source year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
$49,824 maximum before Social Security offset and phaseout. Statute uses federal AGI; the $255,800 joint 2026 phaseout threshold is reconstructed from the legally specified September 2025 BLS vintage.
$49,824 maximum before Social Security offset and phaseout. Statute uses federal AGI; the $255,800 joint 2026 phaseout threshold is reconstructed from the legally specified September 2025 BLS vintage.
- Maine retirement income FAQ, revised April 13, 2026Source year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Retirement-income rule only; not verification of every rate or example on the linked page.
- Maine Title 36 section 5122: pension phaseout income baseSource year / applicable rules: 2025 · Verified 2026-09-12
M-3 opening text uses federal AGI. Enacted Chapter 662 retains that definition; the statute governs instead of the inconsistent FAQ shorthand.
- Maine enacted Chapter 662, printed textSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Page 2 amends filing-status phaseout amounts; does not replace the opening federal-AGI definition.
- Maine sections 5402–5403: chained-CPI vintage and roundingSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Retirement-income rule only; not verification of every rate or example on the linked page.
- BLS chained CPI, September 15, 2025 vintage preserved by Federal Reserve ALFREDSource year / applicable rules: 2025 · Verified 2026-09-12
Actual historical monthly indexes, not revised current data. The twelve-month June-window ratio and statutory downward $50 rounding yield $255,800 for joint 2026 pension relief.
- Maine Revenue: 2026 estate exclusion and rate tableSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
- Maryland Comptroller pension exclusionSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
2026 maximum $40,600 per person less gross Social Security; ordinary IRA, SEP and Keogh benefits ineligible.
2026 maximum $40,600 per person less gross Social Security; ordinary IRA, SEP and Keogh benefits ineligible.
- Maryland pension exclusion: 2026 maximum $40,600Source year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Retirement-income rule only; not verification of every rate or example on the linked page.
- Maryland seniors and retirees: Social Security offsetSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Retirement-income rule only; not verification of every rate or example on the linked page.
- Maryland Comptroller: estate exclusion and portabilitySource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
- Maryland Register of Wills: exempt heirs and 10% collateral inheritance taxSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
- Massachusetts tax treatment of pensionsSource year / applicable rules: 2024 · Verified 2026-09-12
Private pension taxation and recovery of contributions previously taxed by Massachusetts; profile has no state basis.
Private pension taxation and recovery of contributions previously taxed by Massachusetts; profile has no state basis.
- Massachusetts DOR: estate tax guide, updated April 23, 2026Source year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
- Michigan Revenue Administrative Bulletin 2026-1, January 8, 2026Source year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Qualified distribution definitions and 2026 deduction methods; voluntary unmatched employee 401(k) funding is not in the eligible retirement pool.
Qualified distribution definitions and 2026 deduction methods; voluntary unmatched employee 401(k) funding is not in the eligible retirement pool.
- Michigan 2026 withholding guide: retirement deduction limitsSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Retirement-income rule only; not verification of every rate or example on the linked page.
- Michigan Revenue Administrative Bulletin 2026-1Source year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Retirement-income rule only; not verification of every rate or example on the linked page.
- Michigan withholding guidance for retirees: eligible plan fundingSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Employee-only contributions do not meet qualifying employer-plan distribution conditions.
- Minnesota Revenue: seniorsSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Resident pension income is taxable; special public-pension and Social Security relief are separate from this private-plan exposure.
Resident pension income is taxable; special public-pension and Social Security relief are separate from this private-plan exposure.
- Minnesota Statutes 291.016: estate base, addbacks and $3 million exclusionSource year / applicable rules: 2025 · Verified 2026-09-12
- Minnesota Statutes 291.03: estate tax rate scheduleSource year / applicable rules: 2025 · Verified 2026-09-12
- Mississippi income-tax regulations, Title 35 Part III Chapter 07Source year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Qualifying retirement-plan and IRA distributions are excluded; premature or nonqualifying distributions are not.
Qualifying retirement-plan and IRA distributions are excluded; premature or nonqualifying distributions are not.
- Missouri Revenue pension exemption FAQSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Private pension relief remains income-sensitive; broader public-pension relief does not apply to the profile.
Private pension relief remains income-sensitive; broader public-pension relief does not apply to the profile.
- Montana Revenue tax simplification resource hubSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Prior partial pension deduction repealed in 2024; new general age-65 subtraction indexed beginning in 2025.
Prior partial pension deduction repealed in 2024; new general age-65 subtraction indexed beginning in 2025.
- Montana tax simplification: retirement and age deductionsSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Retirement-income rule only; not verification of every rate or example on the linked page.
- Nebraska 2025 Schedule I adjustmentsSource year / applicable rules: 2025 · Verified 2026-09-12
Social Security, military and civil-service adjustments are listed; none is a general private-plan exclusion.
Social Security, military and civil-service adjustments are listed; none is a general private-plan exclusion.
- Nebraska Revenue: inheritance rates and exemptions effective from 2023Source year / applicable rules: 2022 · Verified 2026-09-12
- Nevada Department of Taxation: income tax in NevadaSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Nevada does not impose individual income tax.
Nevada does not impose individual income tax.
- New Hampshire DRA: interest-and-dividends repealSource year / applicable rules: 2025 · Verified 2026-09-12
No broad retirement income tax; interest-and-dividends repeal effective January 1, 2025, not 2026.
No broad retirement income tax; interest-and-dividends repeal effective January 1, 2025, not 2026.
- New Jersey Division of Taxation: retirement incomeSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Retirement exclusion unavailable above $150,000 New Jersey total income; profile exceeds this even without Social Security.
Retirement exclusion unavailable above $150,000 New Jersey total income; profile exceeds this even without Social Security.
- New Jersey Taxation: estate repeal and inheritance taxSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
- New Jersey Taxation: inheritance beneficiary classesSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
- New Jersey Taxation: inheritance ratesSource year / applicable rules: 2025 · Verified 2026-09-12
- New Mexico personal-income-tax overviewSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Age-65 relief is a general income-dependent exemption; it is not a private-plan category exclusion.
Age-65 relief is a general income-dependent exemption; it is not a private-plan category exclusion.
- New York tax information for seniorsSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
$20,000 eligible pension/annuity exclusion per recipient age 59½; unused spousal exclusion is not transferable.
$20,000 eligible pension/annuity exclusion per recipient age 59½; unused spousal exclusion is not transferable.
- New York tax information for seniorsSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Retirement-income rule only; not verification of every rate or example on the linked page.
- New York Taxation: 2026 estate basic exclusionSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
- North Carolina Bailey retirement-benefit guidanceSource year / applicable rules: 2025 · Verified 2026-09-12
Bailey relief concerns specified vested government systems, not modeled private benefits; page identifies tax year 2025.
Bailey relief concerns specified vested government systems, not modeled private benefits; page identifies tax year 2025.
- North Dakota 2025 income-tax instructionsSource year / applicable rules: 2025 · Verified 2026-09-12
Federal-income starting point and listed state adjustments; general tax brackets do not exempt private-plan income as a category.
Federal-income starting point and listed state adjustments; general tax brackets do not exempt private-plan income as a category.
- Ohio Revised Code 5747.055Source year / applicable rules: 2019 · Verified 2026-09-12
Retirement and senior relief are tax credits subject to income limits, not subtractions from the private-plan income base.
Retirement and senior relief are tax credits subject to income limits, not subtractions from the private-plan income base.
- Oklahoma Tax Commission: other retirement incomeSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
$10,000 per recipient for specified qualifying retirement benefits, coordinated with other retirement exclusions.
$10,000 per recipient for specified qualifying retirement benefits, coordinated with other retirement exclusions.
- Oklahoma retirement income exclusionsSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Retirement-income rule only; not verification of every rate or example on the linked page.
- Oregon Revenue personal-income-tax guidanceSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Resident pension income taxable; credits and pre-October-1991 federal-service relief are separate.
Resident pension income taxable; credits and pre-October-1991 federal-service relief are separate.
- Oregon Revised Statutes 118.010: estate tax base and ratesSource year / applicable rules: 2025 · Verified 2026-09-12
- Pennsylvania personal-income-tax guide: gross compensationSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Pennsylvania eligible retirement-plan conditions and retirement status; federal qualification alone does not control.
Pennsylvania eligible retirement-plan conditions and retirement status; federal qualification alone does not control.
- Pennsylvania Revenue: inheritance rates and beneficiary exemptionsSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
- Rhode Island retirement-income guide, issued February 2026 for tax year 2025Source year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Guide describes tax year 2025 age/income-limited pension relief. The exact 2026 indexed threshold remains unpublished; the fixed $291,000 federal-AGI household is above the independently bounded eligibility ceiling.
Guide describes tax year 2025 age/income-limited pension relief. The exact 2026 indexed threshold remains unpublished; the fixed $291,000 federal-AGI household is above the independently bounded eligibility ceiling.
- Rhode Island ADV 2025-27: 2026 estate thresholdSource year / applicable rules: 2025 · Verified 2026-09-12
2026 net taxable estate threshold $1,838,056, distinct from annual pension exclusion.
- Rhode Island enacted H7127Aaa, June 12, 2026: Article 6 pension income testSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Article 6, PDF pages 152–154 retains pension eligibility and indexing. Exact 2026 indexed threshold is not published here. The fixed high-income outcome is established separately by a conservative CPI bound.
Enacted text differs from the earlier Article 6 Sub A proposal; the proposal is not used as law.
- Rhode Island ADV2025-22: 2025 joint pension income ceilingSource year / applicable rules: 2025 · Verified 2026-09-12
Pages 3–4 expressly cover 2025 and establish $133,750; not used as the exact 2026 threshold.
- BLS CPI-U public series: September 2023–August 2025Source year / applicable rules: 2025 · Verified 2026-09-12
Nonseasonally adjusted monthly observations bound the change between the two annual windows; source supports a conservative ceiling, not an invented precise 2026 exemption threshold.
- Rhode Island ADV2025-27: 2026 estate credit and thresholdSource year / applicable rules: 2025 · Verified 2026-09-12
- Rhode Island RI-706: computation and 2026 credit, pages 1, 21 and 22Source year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
- South Carolina income-tax FAQsSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Age-65 retirement deduction $10,000 per recipient; separate age deduction is reduced by retirement deduction.
Age-65 retirement deduction $10,000 per recipient; separate age deduction is reduced by retirement deduction.
- South Carolina individual income tax FAQSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Retirement-income rule only; not verification of every rate or example on the linked page.
- South Dakota Revenue sales/use tax guideSource year / applicable rules: 2022 · Verified 2026-09-12
Explicit no-individual-income-tax statement only; obsolete sales rates elsewhere in this edition are not used.
Explicit no-individual-income-tax statement only; obsolete sales rates elsewhere in this edition are not used.
- Tennessee Revenue: Hall income-tax repealSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Hall income tax ended for tax periods beginning January 1, 2021; no broad individual income tax on modeled distributions.
Hall income tax ended for tax periods beginning January 1, 2021; no broad individual income tax on modeled distributions.
- Texas Constitution Article VIII, section 24-aSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Constitutional prohibition of a tax on individuals net incomes.
Constitutional prohibition of a tax on individuals net incomes.
- Utah TC-40A supplemental schedule instructionsSource year / applicable rules: 2025 · Verified 2026-09-12
Retirement and Social Security relief are credits; the displayed worksheet is tax year 2025 and is not a 2026 rate source.
Retirement and Social Security relief are credits; the displayed worksheet is tax year 2025 and is not a 2026 rate source.
- Vermont statutes, Title 32 chapter 151, section 5830eSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Income-limited Social Security, CSRS and specified other retirement provisions; no exemption at the modeled $291,000 income.
Income-limited Social Security, CSRS and specified other retirement provisions; no exemption at the modeled $291,000 income.
- Vermont Taxes: estate tax and June 2026 filing changeSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
- Vermont Statutes 32 VSA7442a: 16% above $5 millionSource year / applicable rules: 2025 · Verified 2026-09-12
- Virginia Tax: subtractionsSource year / applicable rules: 2025 · Verified 2026-09-12
General age deduction and special previously state-taxed retirement contributions; no state contribution basis is modeled.
General age deduction and special previously state-taxed retirement contributions; no state contribution basis is modeled.
- Washington Revenue capital-gains FAQSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Retirement-account assets are excluded from the separate capital-gains tax; current profile is tax year 2026.
Retirement-account assets are excluded from the separate capital-gains tax; current profile is tax year 2026.
- Washington Revenue: estate tables and July 1, 2026 changeSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
- West Virginia senior-citizen Social Security modificationSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Full Social Security exclusion in 2026 and interaction with age-based modifications.
Full Social Security exclusion in 2026 and interaction with age-based modifications.
- West Virginia Social Security modification: full exemption in 2026Source year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Retirement-income rule only; not verification of every rate or example on the linked page.
- Wisconsin Revenue retired-person FAQSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Law as of February 4, 2026: $24,000 age-67 retirement subtraction, $48,000 joint when both qualify, and restriction on claiming credits.
Law as of February 4, 2026: $24,000 age-67 retirement subtraction, $48,000 joint when both qualify, and restriction on claiming credits.
- Wisconsin retirement income FAQSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Retirement-income rule only; not verification of every rate or example on the linked page.
- Wyoming government: about WyomingSource year / applicable rules: 2026 · Verified 2026-09-12
Wyoming has no individual income tax.
Wyoming has no individual income tax.
The Census property-tax figure is a median dollar bill on owner-occupied homes, not a tax rate on rentals. BLS physician wages exclude self-employment. NAIC premiums describe owner-occupied HO-3 policies. CMS healthcare spending includes several payers and all ages. BLS accommodation employment includes hotels and other lodging; it is not STR revenue.
State-specific primary-authority links appear with each state. A source listed for one tax category does not verify a different category.
Common questions
Does the highest score mean the lowest total retirement taxes?
No. The score combines the stated plan-income exposure, living-cost and livability measures. It does not calculate taxes on the household’s Social Security or investment income, or its estate and sales taxes. Use the overall grade to identify places worth investigating, then compare complete tax returns and a destination-specific budget.
Why can states with very different tax rates tie in the retirement-income category?
That category measures qualifying plan income exposed to tax before rates, general deductions and credits. Two states including the same $180,000 can receive the same category grade while producing different tax bills. Likewise, zero exposure in Illinois does not mean that its property or investment taxes match Florida’s. Equal measured results remain tied.
Which states do not tax qualifying retirement income?
The modeled qualified-plan income is exempt in Illinois, Iowa, Mississippi and Pennsylvania, subject to their eligibility rules. Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington and Wyoming also have zero exposure for this 2026 plan-income comparison. This does not make every other kind of income or transaction tax-free.
Why does Illinois score differently for retirees and landlords?
Retirees may benefit from Illinois’s qualifying retirement-income subtraction. Landlords must evaluate property taxes, operating costs, rental income and local rules. These are different cash flows, so the two guides use different financial factors.
Does a retirement exemption cover my dividends and capital gains?
Not automatically. The character of the income matters. Ordinary brokerage returns are not qualified retirement-plan distributions simply because the owner no longer works. The household model keeps $60,000 of investment income separate from its plans.
Why is the retirement model age 67?
Age determines eligibility for several state provisions, including Wisconsin’s age-67 exclusion. Both spouses are assumed to qualify and receive half of every income category. A younger retiree or unequal account ownership needs a different calculation.
Can a Roth conversion change the best state?
Yes. A conversion can change taxable income, phaseouts and the timing of state tax. Its treatment must be checked under the destination state’s rules and your circumstances. This distribution profile does not assume that every state treats every conversion identically.
Does Medicare make healthcare costs equal in every state?
No. Your chosen coverage, prescriptions, providers and supplemental arrangements still matter. The CMS figure is all-payer healthcare spending per resident and is not an estimate of your Medicare bill.
Can a state exempt my IRA withdrawals and still tax my estate or heirs?
Yes. Illinois and Pennsylvania illustrate the distinction. Illinois’s qualifying retirement-income subtraction is separate from its estate tax; Pennsylvania’s eligible retirement distributions are separate from its beneficiary-dependent inheritance tax. Review assets, ownership, domicile and beneficiaries rather than extending an annual income exemption to every transfer.
Did Illinois make groceries entirely tax-free in 2026?
No. Illinois ended its state 1% grocery tax on January 1, 2026, but authorized local grocery taxes and specified transit taxes can remain. The destination’s local rules and the actual items purchased determine the bill.
Should I move before taking a large distribution?
Compare bona fide residency, distribution timing, income character and the other costs of moving before deciding. A mailing address alone is not a completed residency analysis, and the guide does not provide an individualized relocation recommendation.
Does the retirement comparison include all 50 states?
Yes. The fixed qualified-plan exposure measure is calculated for every state, including Maine’s indexed 2026 phaseout. Equal outcomes retain equal ranks. This measure covers the published plan-income profile; it does not calculate an entire state return or an estate tax.
Should retirees favor a tax-free state over a place they enjoy?
Taxes are one part of a retirement plan. Access to family, suitable housing, healthcare providers and activities can justify higher costs. Compare the complete household budget and daily routine before treating the lowest tax bill as the best outcome.
Does a retirement-income exemption cover investment income too?
Do not assume it does. Retirement accounts, pensions, Social Security and taxable investments can receive different treatment. The guide separates these income categories so an exemption for one stream is not applied to the whole household.
Is statewide healthcare spending my expected retirement medical bill?
No. The CMS measure includes all ages and multiple payers. Your costs depend on coverage, providers, medication and care needs. Use actual plan and provider information when evaluating a relocation.
How should I test a possible retirement location?
Compare the same income mix and housing plan, then spend time in the area during seasons that matter to you. Check access to family and care, transportation needs and the recurring costs you will actually face.
Why can the WalletHub rank differ from the rank on this card?
The card identifies WalletHub’s Quality of Life category rank. The linked study also has a separate Overall Rank column that incorporates affordability, economy, education and health, and safety. Illinois is #5 in Quality of Life but #18 overall in the 2026 WalletHub study. Taxstra’s headline rank combines the named financial factors with that quality-of-life category using our published weights; it is not WalletHub’s overall ranking.
Can readers customize the published ranking?
No. Each guide uses one fixed methodology and the same assumptions for every state. State search, map selection, shared links and embedded cards all use that published ranking. Separate financial examples explain the assumptions without changing the leaderboard.
How does Taxstra include livability in the ranking?
Composite guides combine their named financial factors with WalletHub’s Quality of Life category at fixed, guide-specific weights: 80% financial and 20% quality of life for physician and retirement composites; 90% financial and 10% quality of life for business and property composites. Direct tax, PTET and depreciation comparisons do not include quality of life in their ranking. Everyone sees the same ranking; choosing a state changes the displayed card, not the methodology. The score is a comparison tool, not an estimate of happiness or a completed tax return.
What does the livability measure include?
We use WalletHub’s 2026 quality-of-life category, which considers amenities, mobility, environmental conditions and leisure. Its methodology is linked in the sources. This category does not fully capture family ties, personal climate preferences, a particular school district or an individual neighborhood.
Does a score of 8.0 mean a state is 80% better?
No. The 1–10 grades describe relative results within the comparison. A score of 8.0 is neither a percentage tax saving nor a probability that you will enjoy living there. Review the underlying measures, fixed weights and limitations before making a shortlist.
Why can two states share a rank?
Taxstra ranks composite scores rounded to two decimals while cards display one decimal. Equal ranking values share the same competition rank. Direct dollar comparisons rank whole-dollar outcomes. Missing observations remain unranked when the selected calculation needs them; they are not replaced with zero.
Continue your research
Make the comparison yours.
Bring your offer, income mix or property numbers. Taxstra can help connect the state rules to a coordinated plan.
