The most equipment-dense building on the block
Per square foot, few buildings carry more short-life property than a restaurant. The back of house is essentially a factory: hoods and their fire suppression, walk-in coolers, cook lines, dish pits, and the oversized electrical, gas, and plumbing runs that exist only to serve them. The front of house is finish-heavy by design, decorative lighting, millwork, banquettes, feature walls, because the room is part of the product. Then the site adds patios, drive-through lanes, monument signage, and parking.
Engineered Tax Services reports typical acceleration of 25% to 45% of basis for restaurants. The wide range mostly reflects ownership structure: an owner-operator who holds the building and funded the entire build-out captures everything, while a landlord who shelled a building and took a tenant's build-out captures much less.
That ownership question, plus the restaurant-specific extras (smallwares expensing, QIP on renovations, the FICA tip credit), is what makes restaurant tax planning its own discipline rather than generic real estate work.
Only improvements you own enter your study. Before pricing a restaurant study, establish who paid for what: shell, build-out, equipment, site work. The answer routinely moves six figures of basis between the landlord's schedule and the operator's.
What Reclassifies in a Restaurant
Back of house, front of house, and the lot outside.
| Component | MACRS life | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Kitchen equipment: lines, hoods, walk-ins, dish systems | 5-year | Restaurant equipment is classic short-life personal property |
| Dedicated gas, electrical, and plumbing serving equipment | 5-year | The allocated share of utilities that exist for the kitchen |
| Decorative lighting, millwork, banquettes, feature finishes | 5-year | Ornamentation distinct from the building shell |
| POS systems, drive-through communication, AV | 5-year | Operational systems |
| Patios, outdoor dining hardscape, fencing | 15-year | Land improvements that grew during the outdoor-dining era |
| Drive-through lanes, parking, exterior lighting, monument signs | 15-year | Site improvements |
| Building shell, restrooms, core HVAC, general lighting | 39-year | The structure remains nonresidential real property |
Ventilation is allocated: hood exhaust and make-up air serving the cook line lean equipment; comfort HVAC for the dining room stays with the building. This split is where engineering quality shows.
Worked example (illustrative)
Owner-operated freestanding restaurant, $2.1M all-in
- Building and site acquisition plus build-out
- $2,100,000
- Land allocation
- ($400,000)
- Depreciable basis
- $1,700,000
- Reclassified to 5-year (kitchen, utilities, finishes)
- $420,000
- Reclassified to 15-year (patio, drive-through, parking)
- $180,000
- Total accelerated (35.3% of basis)
- $600,000
- Year 1 deduction with 100% bonus
- ~$600,000 plus straight-line on the remainder
Illustrative round numbers within the ETS 25-45% range. Owner-operators materially participating in the restaurant generally deduct against business income without the passive-loss gate that limits landlords.
Tenant, Landlord, or Both: Who Gets the Study
The QIP rules give leased restaurants their own version of acceleration.
Most restaurants lease. A leasing operator cannot study the landlord's building, but the build-out the operator funded is the operator's basis, and much of it is either 5-year equipment outright or Qualified Improvement Property: interior improvements to a nonresidential building placed in service after the building itself. QIP carries a 15-year life and bonus eligibility, which means a leased restaurant's interior build-out can reach a Year 1 deduction profile surprisingly close to an owned building's.
On the landlord side, tenant improvement allowances need structuring attention: whether the landlord or tenant owns the improvements (and who depreciates them) follows the lease terms and who bears the economic cost, and a Section 110 short-term lease construction allowance keeps a qualifying allowance out of the tenant's income with the landlord owning the improvements. Getting this wrong strands basis on the wrong schedule.
Owner-operators who hold the real estate in a separate LLC and lease it to the operating company get the worst of both worlds by default (passive rental loss meets active income) unless the self-rental and grouping analysis is done. Done right, the structure delivers liability separation and a usable deduction.
Do not study basis you do not own
Study proposals sometimes quote the whole property without asking who owns the build-out. If the landlord funded and owns the improvements, an operator's study of them produces deductions an examiner can unwind. Establish ownership from the lease and the allowance documents first.
The Restaurant-Only Extras
Smallwares, tips, and the renovation cycle.
- Smallwares expensing: under Rev. Proc. 2002-12, restaurants can expense smallwares (plates, glassware, pans, utensils) as supplies rather than capitalizing, keeping an entire category out of the depreciation conversation.
- FICA tip credit: the Section 45B credit for employer FICA paid on reported tips is a direct credit many operators underclaim; it stacks with, and is independent of, the depreciation strategy.
- QIP on refreshes: dining room renovations of a leased or owned nonresidential space are 15-year, bonus-eligible QIP; pair each remodel with a partial disposition of what was demolished if a study documented it.
- Section 179 as the bonus alternative for equipment-heavy years, useful where state conformity treats 179 better than bonus.
- Monthly books that separate equipment, build-out, and repairs, plus prime-cost reporting: our restaurant clients run this through outsourced bookkeeping, and the deduction guide at restaurant tax deductions covers the operating-expense side.
Hypothetical case study
The second location that funded itself
This is a hypothetical, illustrative composite, not an actual client or an actual result. Savings vary with your income, entity, state, and how usable the losses are.
A hypothetical operator with one profitable location signs a lease on a second space and spends $780,000 on the build-out: $310,000 of kitchen equipment, $360,000 of interior construction qualifying as QIP, and $110,000 of furniture and systems.
With 100% bonus depreciation across all three pools, the operator deducts essentially the entire build-out in Year 1 against the first location's profits. At the owner's bracket the federal and state benefit approaches $290,000 in this hypothetical, cash that materially offsets the expansion's working capital needs. No cost segregation study was needed for the leased space; correct classification of the operator's own spending did the work.
Hypothetical composite, not a client result. The lesson: for leased restaurants, disciplined invoice-level classification at build-out often is the study.
How We Run Restaurant Engagements
Studies where they pay, classification where they do not.
For owned buildings and large multi-unit portfolios we coordinate engineering studies through Engineered Tax Services; for leased build-outs we implement classification, QIP treatment, and elections directly from your construction records. Either way Taxstra files the schedules, the Form 3115 catch-ups where history warrants, and coordinates the tip credit and smallwares methods in the same return.
Disclosure: Taxstra may receive a referral fee if you engage ETS through links on this page.
Estimate Your Savings
A quick estimate from the ETS calculator, then a study only if the numbers justify it.
Estimate Your Cost Segregation Savings
Run your property through the Engineered Tax Services savings calculator for a quick estimate, then have Taxstra pressure-test the number against your full tax picture.
Loading calculator...
Calculator provided by Engineered Tax Services. Estimates are educational only and depend on an engineering-based study of your specific property; results are not individualized tax advice.
Disclosure: Taxstra may receive a referral fee if you engage Engineered Tax Services through links on this page. That relationship does not change your price, and it is not a recommendation for your specific situation.
See What a Study Could Do for Your Property
Engineered Tax Services performs the engineering-based study. Taxstra turns the report into actual tax savings on your return and coordinates the strategy around it. Start with their calculator or real case studies.
Want proof first? See real client case studies from ETS with the numbers behind each study.
Disclosure: Taxstra may receive a referral fee if you engage Engineered Tax Services through links on this page. That relationship does not change your price, and it is not a recommendation for your specific situation.
What to check before you order a study
The pre-study review that decides whether the deduction is actually usable.
Pull the lease and TI allowance documents; establish who owns which improvements before anything is studied.
Separate equipment, build-out, and smallwares in the construction ledger from day one.
Confirm QIP eligibility dates on interior work (placed in service after the building, interior, not enlargement/structural).
Screen for the FICA tip credit if you have tipped employees; it is independent money.
Model self-rental and grouping if your real estate LLC leases to your operating company.
Ballpark study economics in the cost segregation estimator for owned buildings.
