Taxstra Logo

States With the Biggest Tax Penalty for High Earners

See which states charge more income tax at the same taxable income. Compare published examples from $250,000 to $2 million; local taxes are shown separately.

The published 50-state ranking

See which states charge more income tax at the same taxable income. Compare published examples from $250,000 to $2 million; local taxes are shown separately.

For the largest-tax comparison, rank 1 means the highest calculated state tax. The separate tax-cost grade still rewards a lower bill: 10/10 means the lowest cost. Tax burden order and cost grade answer different questions.

Higher scores mean a stronger result on the factors this guide measures. They do not guarantee a better fit for your household or investment. Ties stay tied, and missing data is clearly marked.

Taxstra’s published 2026 ranking. One methodology, applied consistently to every state. See the factors and scoring rules.

Pick a state. See how it fits.

Explore grades out of 10, category ranks and the tradeoffs behind them. Each state uses the same published factors and weights.

The map loads when the page opens. All 50 states are available in the selector and table.

1 / 1010 / 10

Gray = unavailable or provisional; no comparable rank. Alaska and Hawaii shown as insets.

Boundaries: U.S. Census Bureau / US Atlas.

Why Illinois scores this way

Illinois ranks #23 of 50, with $49,500. The category tiles show its strengths and tradeoffs.

A higher category score means a stronger result on that measure. Check the “Good fit for” and “Less suited to” notes against your own priorities.

Taxstra Tax and Accounting Services2026 state guide

High-earner tax comparison

Illinois

Taxstra’s state comparison

Illinois outline
5.3/ 10

Tax-cost grade · lower tax scores higher#23 highest state tax

How to read this score

2026 regular state wage tax before credits on the stated state-taxable-income base. One earner; state AGI assumed equal to the stated taxable base for recapture calculations. Excludes local, payroll, federal and entity taxes. Equal taxable income is not equal gross household income. Missing schedules remain unranked.

Tax on $250K taxable wages

#18 of 50 · highest tax · Not in overall score
4.8/10

$12,375 in state tax for a married couple filing jointly at this taxable income; credits and local taxes are excluded.

Tax on $500K taxable wages

#23 of 50 · highest tax · Not in overall score
5.2/10

$24,750 in state tax for a married couple filing jointly at this taxable income; credits and local taxes are excluded.

Tax on $1M taxable wages

#23 of 50 · highest tax · 100% weight
5.3/10

$49,500 in state tax for a married couple filing jointly at this taxable income; credits and local taxes are excluded.

Tax on $2M taxable wages

#23 of 50 · highest tax · Not in overall score
5.9/10

$99,000 in state tax for a married couple filing jointly at this taxable income; credits and local taxes are excluded.

Good fit for

  • Wage earners comparing Illinois job offers against the $49,500 state-tax benchmark on a $1 million taxable base

Less suited to

  • Households applying a taxable-wage benchmark directly to gross salary, business profit or investment gains

Illinois: full analysis and evidenceRead the state-specific explanation and supporting sources.

Illinois

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $280,700Monthly gross rent $1,322HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,480

Illinois’s $1 million state-taxable wage benchmark is $49,500 before credits. An owner receiving both salary and K-1 income needs the replacement-tax and PTET layers modeled separately from this wage result.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $12,375 on $250,000; $24,750 on $500,000; $49,500 on $1,000,000; $99,000 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Illinois retirement-tax details

Cite the state. Include the method.

Use the state, guide title, published methodology and source years when citing a score. State selection changes the card, not the ranking methodology.

Media and interview inquiries · Source data · Taxstra methodology

Full ranking table · 50 of 50 statesCompare every state’s rank, housing costs, property taxes and tax treatment.

50 of 50 states

High-earner tax comparison: economic observations and tax context
RankStateLargest state wage tax: $1,000,000 taxable, jointHome value
ACS 2024
Property-tax bill
ACS 2024 median
Price index
BEA 2024
Individual bonus treatment
1Oregon$95,4871.0 / 10 category grade$497,500$3,895103.4Oregon disallows federal bonus depreciation for 2026 to 2027; implementing recovery instructions are pending.
2Hawaii$90,4321.5 / 10 category grade$875,900$2,385110.0Hawaii does not allow the federal bonus deduction; compute Hawaii depreciation separately.
3Minnesota$89,0041.6 / 10 category grade$344,600$3,50198.6For §168(k), add back 80% and deduct one-fifth of that addition in each of the next five years. Qualified production property under §168(n) is not added back.
4California$88,7341.6 / 10 category grade$759,500$5,369110.7California does not conform to federal bonus depreciation; compute California depreciation separately.
5Vermont$79,1112.5 / 10 category grade$352,800$5,02698.0Vermont disallows §168(k) and §168(n), then permits recovery under the non-bonus depreciation schedule.
6New Jersey$72,6583.2 / 10 category grade$496,000$9,358108.8New Jersey does not follow the federal bonus deduction; calculate New Jersey depreciation and basis separately.
7Maine$70,4603.4 / 10 category grade$341,900$3,10397.1Add back the federal bonus amount and claim depreciation under Maine’s pro-forma computation.
8Connecticut$68,9003.5 / 10 category grade$396,900$6,573103.6Add back 100% of federal bonus, then deduct 25% of the addition in each of the next four years.
9New York$68,5003.5 / 10 category grade$449,800$6,542107.9Reverse federal §168(k) and §168(n) deductions and claim New York depreciation.
10Wisconsin$65,2703.8 / 10 category grade$294,700$3,68094.1Wisconsin does not adopt federal §168(k) or §168(n); compute Wisconsin depreciation separately.
11Delaware$64,9843.9 / 10 category grade$371,600$1,75099.8Ordinary eligible 2026 property retains 20% bonus under the pre-OBBBA schedule; the rest follows regular depreciation.
12Maryland$57,3234.6 / 10 category grade$436,300$4,144105.0Generally decoupled from federal bonus; qualifying manufacturing property may receive different treatment.
13Virginia$57,2434.6 / 10 category grade$403,500$2,872101.1Recompute Virginia depreciation as though the federal bonus provisions did not apply.
14Rhode Island$56,7684.6 / 10 category grade$455,700$4,886102.3Compute depreciation and basis as though federal bonus depreciation had not been enacted.
15Kansas$55,6254.8 / 10 category grade$238,700$2,98390.1Current Kansas statutes recognize federal §168(k); a direct current official statement on §168(n) was not located.
16Montana$55,5984.8 / 10 category grade$425,400$2,93994.6Montana begins with the current federal income base and has no current bonus-depreciation addback.
17New Mexico$55,0394.8 / 10 category grade$279,900$1,77692.2Ordinary §168(k) bonus flows into individual income in 2026. The enacted 2027 depreciation reversal changes the corporate base, not the individual base.
18Idaho$52,4775.1 / 10 category grade$446,400$1,91295.5Add back the federal bonus difference in the first year; deduct later Idaho-versus-federal depreciation differences.
19South Carolina$51,1345.2 / 10 category grade$299,500$1,33793.7Use South Carolina depreciation without federal §168(k) or §168(n).
20Massachusetts$50,0005.3 / 10 category grade$607,400$6,080105.8§168(k) remains disallowed. §168(n) is disallowed for 2026 and follows federal law beginning in 2027.
21Alabama$49,9205.3 / 10 category grade$233,300$89088.8Follows the federal §168(k) and §168(n) deductions for 2026 to 2027.
22Georgia$49,9005.3 / 10 category grade$343,300$2,55496.3Use Georgia depreciation without federal §168(k) or §168(n).
23Illinois$49,5005.3 / 10 category grade$280,700$5,399100.0Reverse federal §168(k)/§168(n) amounts and compute the Illinois depreciation modification.
24Missouri$46,8205.6 / 10 category grade$254,400$2,02190.8Missouri follows current federal depreciation and does not require a bonus addback for current property.
25West Virginia$45,0035.8 / 10 category grade$170,800$88189.5West Virginia adopted the 2025 federal changes, so §168(k) and §168(n) flow through for 2026 to 2027.
26Nebraska$44,8985.8 / 10 category grade$263,100$3,73990.1Nebraska follows the current federal depreciation deduction for 2026 to 2027.
27Oklahoma$44,5715.8 / 10 category grade$222,100$1,67287.8Oklahoma permits a state 100% expensing election for qualifying property; it is not simple federal bonus conformity.
28Utah$44,5005.8 / 10 category grade$545,200$2,64898.9Utah starts with current federal adjusted gross income and does not enumerate a §168(k) or §168(n) reversal.
29Colorado$44,0005.9 / 10 category grade$574,600$2,828103.1Colorado follows the federal deductions for §168(k) bonus and §168(n) qualified production property.
30Michigan$42,5006.0 / 10 category grade$254,200$2,98896.2For individuals and flow-through entities, Michigan retains the pre-OBBBA phaseout: 20% federal bonus in 2026 and 0% in 2027; §168(n) is disallowed.
31North Carolina$39,9006.2 / 10 category grade$333,000$2,04494.3Add back 85% of the federal accelerated-depreciation amount, then deduct 20% of that addition in each of the next five years.
32Mississippi$39,6006.3 / 10 category grade$186,500$1,22187.0Mississippi permits a state 100% first-year deduction for qualifying depreciable property; it is not simple federal bonus conformity.
33Iowa$38,0006.4 / 10 category grade$227,300$2,93787.8Iowa follows current federal depreciation, including §168(k) and §168(n), for 2026 to 2027.
34Arkansas$36,9206.5 / 10 category grade$215,600$1,11386.9Federal bonus depreciation is not adopted; use the Arkansas depreciation computation.
35Kentucky$35,0006.7 / 10 category grade$226,000$1,61190.2Kentucky does not adopt the current federal bonus provisions; use Kentucky depreciation.
36Pennsylvania$30,7007.1 / 10 category grade$277,600$3,21497.6Pennsylvania personal income tax uses its own depreciation rules rather than the federal bonus amount.
37Louisiana$30,0007.2 / 10 category grade$223,200$1,18788.2Louisiana offers an optional state 100% expensing deduction for qualifying property; later federal depreciation on the same basis is added back.
38Indiana$29,5007.2 / 10 category grade$243,500$1,79893.3Add back federal bonus depreciation and maintain Indiana basis for later depreciation or disposition.
39Ohio$27,1167.4 / 10 category grade$239,800$2,93792.8For §168(k), generally add back five-sixths and deduct one-fifth of that addback in each of the next five years. Payroll-growth and NOL exceptions can change the result; §168(n) generally follows federal law.
40Arizona$25,0007.6 / 10 category grade$426,000$1,828100.7Individuals retain the full federal §168(k) bonus amount for eligible new property in 2026; §168(n) is separately added back.
41North Dakota$21,7098.0 / 10 category grade$266,100$2,55089.0North Dakota follows the federal deductions through its current federal income starting point.
42Alaska$010.0 / 10 category grade$376,500$3,976102.4Alaska does not impose a broad individual income tax.
42Florida$010.0 / 10 category grade$396,900$2,993103.4Florida does not impose a broad individual income tax.
42Nevada$010.0 / 10 category grade$455,500$2,143100.0Nevada does not impose a broad individual income tax.
42New Hampshire$010.0 / 10 category grade$458,800$6,707104.2New Hampshire does not impose a broad individual income tax.
42South Dakota$010.0 / 10 category grade$289,600$2,94088.6South Dakota does not impose a broad individual income tax.
42Tennessee$010.0 / 10 category grade$332,600$1,48891.9Tennessee does not impose a broad individual income tax.
42Texas$010.0 / 10 category grade$313,200$4,10897.1Texas does not impose a broad individual income tax.
42Washington$010.0 / 10 category grade$602,200$4,729107.0Washington does not impose a broad individual income tax.
42Wyoming$010.0 / 10 category grade$339,500$1,94792.7Wyoming does not impose a broad individual income tax.
Income-tax scenarios and local taxesExplore the published income levels, filing statuses and named local examples.

Published income-tax scenarios

These preset tables show separate filing statuses and income types at four stated amounts. Viewing another scenario does not change the guide’s published ranking.

Calculation scope: the figures apply verified schedules to separately supplied state taxable income, with wage and ordinary-business modes. State AGI is explicitly assumed equal to the stated taxable base when a recapture calculation needs it. They are not gross-income or combined state/local estimates. Business mode uses a separately supplied ordinary-business taxable base and applies Ohio’s qualifying business deduction; it does not derive a return from gross profit. Full household and capital-gain computations remain separate.

State schedule sensitivity, 2026 · no local tax included · missing results are not zero
State$250,000$500,000$1,000,000$2,000,000Evidence
Alabama$12,4204.97% of taxable income$24,9204.98% of taxable income$49,9204.99% of taxable income$99,9205.00% of taxable incomeState schedule
Alaska$00.00% of taxable income$00.00% of taxable income$00.00% of taxable income$00.00% of taxable incomeState schedule
Arizona$6,2502.50% of taxable income$12,5002.50% of taxable income$25,0002.50% of taxable income$50,0002.50% of taxable incomeState schedule
Arkansas$9,1703.67% of taxable income$18,4203.68% of taxable income$36,9203.69% of taxable income$73,9203.70% of taxable incomeState schedule
California$15,8856.35% of taxable income$39,1357.83% of taxable income$88,7348.87% of taxable income$216,37010.82% of taxable incomeState schedule
Colorado$11,0004.40% of taxable income$22,0004.40% of taxable income$44,0004.40% of taxable income$88,0004.40% of taxable incomeState schedule
Connecticut$13,2005.28% of taxable income$30,8006.16% of taxable income$68,9006.89% of taxable income$139,7006.98% of taxable incomeState schedule
Delaware$15,4846.19% of taxable income$31,9846.40% of taxable income$64,9846.50% of taxable income$130,9846.55% of taxable incomeState schedule
Florida$00.00% of taxable income$00.00% of taxable income$00.00% of taxable income$00.00% of taxable incomeState schedule
Georgia$12,4754.99% of taxable income$24,9504.99% of taxable income$49,9004.99% of taxable income$99,8004.99% of taxable incomeState schedule
Hawaii$16,7826.71% of taxable income$37,4327.49% of taxable income$90,4329.04% of taxable income$200,43210.02% of taxable incomeState schedule
Idaho$12,7275.09% of taxable income$25,9775.20% of taxable income$52,4775.25% of taxable income$105,4775.27% of taxable incomeState schedule
Illinois$12,3754.95% of taxable income$24,7504.95% of taxable income$49,5004.95% of taxable income$99,0004.95% of taxable incomeState schedule
Indiana$7,3752.95% of taxable income$14,7502.95% of taxable income$29,5002.95% of taxable income$59,0002.95% of taxable incomeState schedule
Iowa$9,5003.80% of taxable income$19,0003.80% of taxable income$38,0003.80% of taxable income$76,0003.80% of taxable incomeState schedule
Kansas$13,7755.51% of taxable income$27,7255.55% of taxable income$55,6255.56% of taxable income$111,4255.57% of taxable incomeState schedule
Kentucky$8,7503.50% of taxable income$17,5003.50% of taxable income$35,0003.50% of taxable income$70,0003.50% of taxable incomeState schedule
Louisiana$7,5003.00% of taxable income$15,0003.00% of taxable income$30,0003.00% of taxable income$60,0003.00% of taxable incomeState schedule
Maine$16,8356.73% of taxable income$34,7106.94% of taxable income$70,4607.05% of taxable income$151,9607.60% of taxable incomeState schedule
Maryland$12,3234.93% of taxable income$26,5735.31% of taxable income$57,3235.73% of taxable income$121,8236.09% of taxable incomeState schedule
Massachusetts$12,5005.00% of taxable income$25,0005.00% of taxable income$50,0005.00% of taxable income$135,6906.78% of taxable incomeState schedule
Michigan$10,6254.25% of taxable income$21,2504.25% of taxable income$42,5004.25% of taxable income$85,0004.25% of taxable incomeState schedule
Minnesota$16,8876.75% of taxable income$39,7547.95% of taxable income$89,0048.90% of taxable income$187,5049.38% of taxable incomeState schedule
Mississippi$9,6003.84% of taxable income$19,6003.92% of taxable income$39,6003.96% of taxable income$79,6003.98% of taxable incomeState schedule
Missouri$11,5704.63% of taxable income$23,3204.66% of taxable income$46,8204.68% of taxable income$93,8204.69% of taxable incomeState schedule
Montana$13,2235.29% of taxable income$27,3485.47% of taxable income$55,5985.56% of taxable income$112,0985.60% of taxable incomeState schedule
Nebraska$10,7734.31% of taxable income$22,1484.43% of taxable income$44,8984.49% of taxable income$90,3984.52% of taxable incomeState schedule
Nevada$00.00% of taxable income$00.00% of taxable income$00.00% of taxable income$00.00% of taxable incomeState schedule
New Hampshire$00.00% of taxable income$00.00% of taxable income$00.00% of taxable income$00.00% of taxable incomeState schedule
New Jersey$11,8834.75% of taxable income$27,8085.56% of taxable income$72,6587.27% of taxable income$180,1589.01% of taxable incomeState schedule
New Mexico$11,4394.58% of taxable income$25,5395.11% of taxable income$55,0395.50% of taxable income$114,0395.70% of taxable incomeState schedule
New York$14,7505.90% of taxable income$34,2506.85% of taxable income$68,5006.85% of taxable income$137,0006.85% of taxable incomeState schedule
North Carolina$9,9753.99% of taxable income$19,9503.99% of taxable income$39,9003.99% of taxable income$79,8003.99% of taxable incomeState schedule
North Dakota$3,2601.30% of taxable income$9,2091.84% of taxable income$21,7092.17% of taxable income$46,7092.34% of taxable incomeState schedule
Ohio$6,4912.60% of taxable income$13,3662.67% of taxable income$27,1162.71% of taxable income$54,6162.73% of taxable incomeState schedule
Oklahoma$10,8214.33% of taxable income$22,0714.41% of taxable income$44,5714.46% of taxable income$89,5714.48% of taxable incomeState schedule
Oregon$21,2378.49% of taxable income$45,9879.20% of taxable income$95,4879.55% of taxable income$194,4879.72% of taxable incomeState schedule
Pennsylvania$7,6753.07% of taxable income$15,3503.07% of taxable income$30,7003.07% of taxable income$61,4003.07% of taxable incomeState schedule
Rhode Island$11,8434.74% of taxable income$26,8185.36% of taxable income$56,7685.68% of taxable income$116,6685.83% of taxable incomeState schedule
South Carolina$12,0594.82% of taxable income$25,0845.02% of taxable income$51,1345.11% of taxable income$103,2345.16% of taxable incomeState schedule
South Dakota$00.00% of taxable income$00.00% of taxable income$00.00% of taxable income$00.00% of taxable incomeState schedule
Tennessee$00.00% of taxable income$00.00% of taxable income$00.00% of taxable income$00.00% of taxable incomeState schedule
Texas$00.00% of taxable income$00.00% of taxable income$00.00% of taxable income$00.00% of taxable incomeState schedule
Utah$11,1254.45% of taxable income$22,2504.45% of taxable income$44,5004.45% of taxable income$89,0004.45% of taxable incomeState schedule
Vermont$14,2005.68% of taxable income$35,3617.07% of taxable income$79,1117.91% of taxable income$166,6118.33% of taxable incomeState schedule
Virginia$14,1185.65% of taxable income$28,4935.70% of taxable income$57,2435.72% of taxable income$114,7435.74% of taxable incomeState schedule
Washington$00.00% of taxable income$00.00% of taxable income$00.00% of taxable income$00.00% of taxable incomeState schedule
West Virginia$10,6534.26% of taxable income$22,1034.42% of taxable income$45,0034.50% of taxable income$90,8034.54% of taxable incomeState schedule
Wisconsin$12,4454.98% of taxable income$27,0205.40% of taxable income$65,2706.53% of taxable income$141,7707.09% of taxable incomeState schedule
Wyoming$00.00% of taxable income$00.00% of taxable income$00.00% of taxable income$00.00% of taxable incomeState schedule

New York City adds a local income tax

This 2026 example separates New York State tax from New York City resident tax. It assumes a full-year city resident with ordinary wage income, before credits.

Published assumptions: married filing jointly; $1 million NY State taxable income, $1 million NY adjusted gross income and $1 million NYC taxable income. Taxable income is after applicable deductions and adjustments; AGI is separately specified for state benefit recapture. These amounts do not mean gross household pay.

NY State tax, including recapture
$68,500.00
Additional NYC resident tax
$38,536.00

Uses the official 2026 estimated-tax schedules. Excludes credits, alternative minimum tax, MCTMT, Yonkers tax, federal tax and payroll tax. This is a named NYC resident example, not a statewide local-tax average. Educational, not individualized tax advice.

Sources and verification dates
What changes the comparisonThe tax, legal and financial tradeoffs behind the ranking.

The high-earner comparison ranks regular 2026 state wage tax on the same stated state-taxable-income base. It shows $250,000, $500,000, $1 million and $2 million separately, preserves ties and leaves unverified computations unranked.

Taxable income is not gross income

States differ in deductions, exemptions, additions and phaseouts. Equal state taxable income is a rate-schedule sensitivity test, not a promise that households earning equal gross wages have equal taxable bases.

The extra dollar and the full bill are different

Top marginal rates do not apply to every dollar in a graduated schedule. Massachusetts and Maine also impose surcharges above specific thresholds, while Connecticut and New York require recapture computations.

Keep local taxes named

Indiana counties, Maryland counties/Baltimore City, Michigan cities, Ohio cities/school districts, Pennsylvania localities and Oregon local jurisdictions can add tax. The ranking excludes them; it does not invent an average local rate.

Put the numbers in contextA worked example with explicit assumptions.

At a hypothetical flat 5% rate on $500,000 of state taxable income, the schedule tax is $25,000. That arithmetic does not establish the taxable income generated by $500,000 of gross wages, nor does it include a locality. The denominator and tax base must be labeled.

Illustration only. These assumptions describe the example, not an expected client result.

Every state, explainedBrowse all 50 state chapters, with detailed analysis and linked evidence.
AlabamaRead state analysis

Alabama

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $233,300Monthly gross rent $1,077HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,906

Alabama reaches its 5% ordinary rate at low taxable-income thresholds. Its federal-income-tax deduction makes a comparison using federal taxable income especially misleading: use the Alabama taxable base after state adjustments.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $12,420 on $250,000; $24,920 on $500,000; $49,920 on $1,000,000; $99,920 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Alabama retirement-tax details
AlaskaRead state analysis

Alaska

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $376,500Monthly gross rent $1,444HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,216

Alaska ties the other verified zero-wage-tax states in the 2026 state-only comparison. The tie should remain visible; a property or sales-tax assumption cannot be inserted into an income-tax ranking without changing the metric.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $0 on $250,000; $0 on $500,000; $0 on $1,000,000; $0 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Alaska retirement-tax details
ArizonaRead state analysis

Arizona

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $426,000Monthly gross rent $1,672HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,194

Arizona’s ordinary state-taxable-income schedule produces the same 2.5% marginal rate at $250,000 and $2 million. This does not make payroll, sales taxes or the gross-to-taxable calculation disappear.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $6,250 on $250,000; $12,500 on $500,000; $25,000 on $1,000,000; $50,000 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Arizona retirement-tax details
ArkansasRead state analysis

Arkansas

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $215,600Monthly gross rent $982HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,870

Arkansas uses separate lower- and upper-income tables with a bracket adjustment between them. Only taxable income of at least $97,601 is computed here, which covers the four high-income guide benchmarks without inventing the adjustment.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $9,170 on $250,000; $18,420 on $500,000; $36,920 on $1,000,000; $73,920 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Arkansas retirement-tax details
CaliforniaRead state analysis

California

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $759,500Monthly gross rent $2,104HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,655

California’s FTB issued its 2026 indexing memorandum on September 3. The regular wage calculation uses those updated brackets and adds the 1% behavioral health services tax only above $1 million of taxable income.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $15,885 on $250,000; $39,135 on $500,000; $88,734 on $1,000,000; $216,370 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the California retirement-tax details
ColoradoRead state analysis

Colorado

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $574,600Monthly gross rent $1,822HO-3 premium, 2023 $2,492

The Colorado number is explicitly a regular-tax estimate based on the published 2026 worksheet. It excludes alternative minimum tax and recapture, so it is not a completed Colorado return liability.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $11,000 on $250,000; $22,000 on $500,000; $44,000 on $1,000,000; $88,000 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Colorado retirement-tax details
ConnecticutRead state analysis

Connecticut

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $396,900Monthly gross rent $1,550HO-3 premium, 2023 $2,036

Connecticut’s estimate includes the initial brackets, 2% benefit phaseout and tax recapture from CT-1040ES. An explicit Connecticut AGI is required; at high incomes, leaving out those additions would materially understate state tax.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $13,200 on $250,000; $30,800 on $500,000; $68,900 on $1,000,000; $139,700 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. For this benchmark only, state AGI is explicitly assumed equal to state taxable income. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Connecticut retirement-tax details
DelawareRead state analysis

Delaware

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $371,600Monthly gross rent $1,530HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,196

Delaware’s regular individual schedule reaches 6.6% above $60,000 of taxable income. The state-only number excludes Wilmington earned-income tax and does not measure gross receipts tax incurred by a business.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $15,484 on $250,000; $31,984 on $500,000; $64,984 on $1,000,000; $130,984 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Delaware retirement-tax details
FloridaRead state analysis

Florida

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $396,900Monthly gross rent $1,812HO-3 premium, 2023 $2,779

Florida’s zero 2026 wage-tax result is a real tie with other no-wage-tax states. It is not an estimate of insurance, property taxes or the cost of maintaining a corporation.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $0 on $250,000; $0 on $500,000; $0 on $1,000,000; $0 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Florida retirement-tax details
GeorgiaRead state analysis

Georgia

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $343,300Monthly gross rent $1,506HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,828

The 4.99% wage schedule is verified in Georgia’s 2026 tax update. HB1023 supplies the matching entity-rate rule, but an unrelated W-2 employee cannot reduce wage tax through a fictional PTET election.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $12,475 on $250,000; $24,950 on $500,000; $49,900 on $1,000,000; $99,800 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Georgia retirement-tax details
HawaiiRead state analysis

Hawaii

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $875,900Monthly gross rent $1,942HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,549

Hawaii’s ordinary brackets distinguish single and joint returns, and the 2025 bracket expansion also applies in 2026. A million-dollar wage result does not represent Hawaii’s separate treatment of capital gains.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $16,782 on $250,000; $37,432 on $500,000; $90,432 on $1,000,000; $200,432 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Hawaii retirement-tax details
IdahoRead state analysis

Idaho

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $446,400Monthly gross rent $1,384HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,135

Idaho’s verified annual page still supplies 2025 indexed zero-rate thresholds. This guide leaves the 2026 calculation unavailable rather than combining a current 5.3% headline rate with an unverified threshold.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $12,727 on $250,000; $25,977 on $500,000; $52,477 on $1,000,000; $105,477 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Idaho retirement-tax details
IllinoisRead state analysis

Illinois

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $280,700Monthly gross rent $1,322HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,480

Illinois’s $1 million state-taxable wage benchmark is $49,500 before credits. An owner receiving both salary and K-1 income needs the replacement-tax and PTET layers modeled separately from this wage result.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $12,375 on $250,000; $24,750 on $500,000; $49,500 on $1,000,000; $99,000 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Illinois retirement-tax details
IndianaRead state analysis

Indiana

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $243,500Monthly gross rent $1,104HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,259

The Indiana number intentionally excludes county income tax. Choose an actual county and the applicable rate date before comparing take-home pay with a state that lacks a local income tax.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $7,375 on $250,000; $14,750 on $500,000; $29,500 on $1,000,000; $59,000 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Indiana retirement-tax details
IowaRead state analysis

Iowa

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $227,300Monthly gross rent $981HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,342

Iowa’s 2026 ordinary individual rate is 3.8%. The wage comparison excludes low-income alternative-tax rules and school-district surtax, and it does not pass a hypothetical business election credit through to salary.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $9,500 on $250,000; $19,000 on $500,000; $38,000 on $1,000,000; $76,000 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Iowa retirement-tax details
KansasRead state analysis

Kansas

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $238,700Monthly gross rent $1,079HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,733

Kansas retains different first-bracket widths for single and joint filers. At high taxable income both reach 5.58%, but a single top-rate multiplication misses the lower first bracket.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $13,775 on $250,000; $27,725 on $500,000; $55,625 on $1,000,000; $111,425 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Kansas retirement-tax details
KentuckyRead state analysis

Kentucky

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $226,000Monthly gross rent $998HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,525

Kentucky’s wage-only benchmark uses the new 3.5% state rate. Local occupational taxes are not included, so the correct city/county matters when moving an operating business or payroll.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $8,750 on $250,000; $17,500 on $500,000; $35,000 on $1,000,000; $70,000 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Kentucky retirement-tax details
LouisianaRead state analysis

Louisiana

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $223,200Monthly gross rent $1,064HO-3 premium, 2023 $3,027

Louisiana’s flat 3% schedule replaces the former graduated personal schedule. The benchmark starts after Louisiana deductions; multiplying 3% by gross household wages would use the wrong input.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $7,500 on $250,000; $15,000 on $500,000; $30,000 on $1,000,000; $60,000 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Louisiana retirement-tax details
MaineRead state analysis

Maine

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $341,900Monthly gross rent $1,210HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,150

Maine’s 2026 surcharge starts above $1 million for single filers and $1.5 million for joint filers. Exactly $1 million therefore triggers no surcharge in either supported status; the $2 million examples do.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $16,835 on $250,000; $34,710 on $500,000; $70,460 on $1,000,000; $151,960 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Maine retirement-tax details
MarylandRead state analysis

Maryland

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $436,300Monthly gross rent $1,721HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,578

Maryland’s state schedule now reaches 6.5% above $1 million single or $1.2 million joint. The calculator excludes county/Baltimore City tax, which makes its state-only number unsuitable as a complete Maryland bill.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $12,323 on $250,000; $26,573 on $500,000; $57,323 on $1,000,000; $121,823 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Maryland retirement-tax details
MassachusettsRead state analysis

Massachusetts

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $607,400Monthly gross rent $1,848HO-3 premium, 2023 $2,134

The Massachusetts 4% surcharge begins above $1,107,750 in 2026, not exactly $1 million. At a taxable-income base of $1 million, the regular wage benchmark remains $50,000 before credits.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $12,500 on $250,000; $25,000 on $500,000; $50,000 on $1,000,000; $135,690 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Massachusetts retirement-tax details
MichiganRead state analysis

Michigan

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $254,200Monthly gross rent $1,168HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,110

Michigan’s state-only calculation excludes city income taxes. A Detroit residence or workplace needs a named local computation, not an invented average Michigan local-tax percentage.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $10,625 on $250,000; $21,250 on $500,000; $42,500 on $1,000,000; $85,000 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Michigan retirement-tax details
MinnesotaRead state analysis

Minnesota

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $344,600Monthly gross rent $1,291HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,988

Minnesota’s 2026 brackets reach 9.85% at $203,150 single and $337,930 joint. A capital-gain scenario requires separate net-investment-income tax and alternative-minimum analysis.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $16,887 on $250,000; $39,754 on $500,000; $89,004 on $1,000,000; $187,504 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Minnesota retirement-tax details
MississippiRead state analysis

Mississippi

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $186,500Monthly gross rent $990HO-3 premium, 2023 $2,029

The Mississippi wage benchmark assumes one earner. A joint return with two earned incomes can allocate the $10,000 zero-rate amount differently; this module does not invent a second exemption for a nonworking spouse.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $9,600 on $250,000; $19,600 on $500,000; $39,600 on $1,000,000; $79,600 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Mississippi retirement-tax details
MissouriRead state analysis

Missouri

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $254,400Monthly gross rent $1,067HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,589

Missouri’s 2026 MO-1040ES chart supplies the indexed brackets, reaching 4.7% above $9,436. Joint returns allocate income between spouses; this comparison uses one earned income and excludes local earnings taxes.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $11,570 on $250,000; $23,320 on $500,000; $46,820 on $1,000,000; $93,820 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Missouri retirement-tax details
MontanaRead state analysis

Montana

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $425,400Monthly gross rent $1,177HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,768

Montana’s 2026 wage brackets use $47,500 single and $95,000 joint as the breakpoint. Its separate lower long-term capital-gain rates mean a business sale cannot use the wage table unchanged.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $13,223 on $250,000; $27,348 on $500,000; $55,598 on $1,000,000; $112,098 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Montana retirement-tax details
NebraskaRead state analysis

Nebraska

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $263,100Monthly gross rent $1,102HO-3 premium, 2023 $2,142

Nebraska’s verified 2026 estimated-tax worksheet supplies the indexed brackets used here. Both upper brackets use 4.55%, but the lower tiers still reduce the effective rate below a simple 4.55% multiplication.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $10,773 on $250,000; $22,148 on $500,000; $44,898 on $1,000,000; $90,398 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Nebraska retirement-tax details
NevadaRead state analysis

Nevada

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $455,500Monthly gross rent $1,709HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,013

Nevada ties the other zero-state-wage-tax jurisdictions. Its business payroll and gross-revenue taxes belong in an operating-company model and are excluded from the personal-income ranking.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $0 on $250,000; $0 on $500,000; $0 on $1,000,000; $0 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Nevada retirement-tax details
New HampshireRead state analysis

New Hampshire

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $458,800Monthly gross rent $1,558HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,300

New Hampshire repealed its interest-and-dividends tax for periods after 2024, but that personal-tax change did not repeal the business taxes. A million dollars of wages and a million dollars of business income are separate scenarios.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $0 on $250,000; $0 on $500,000; $0 on $1,000,000; $0 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the New Hampshire retirement-tax details
New JerseyRead state analysis

New Jersey

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $496,000Monthly gross rent $1,800HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,551

New Jersey’s resident individual rate reaches 10.75% above $1 million, while income at exactly $1 million is still in the 8.97% bracket. The tax is progressive, so neither rate applies to every dollar.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $11,883 on $250,000; $27,808 on $500,000; $72,658 on $1,000,000; $180,158 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the New Jersey retirement-tax details
New MexicoRead state analysis

New Mexico

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $279,900Monthly gross rent $1,117HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,490

New Mexico’s 2025-and-later schedule remains current in the Taxation and Revenue Department’s January 2026 analysis. Joint filers reach the 5.9% bracket above $315,000; its wage schedule is separate from the PTE base and gross-receipts tax.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $11,439 on $250,000; $25,539 on $500,000; $55,039 on $1,000,000; $114,039 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the New Mexico retirement-tax details
New YorkRead state analysis

New York

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $449,800Monthly gross rent $1,634HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,801

New York’s 2026 estimate worksheets provide both reduced brackets and benefit recapture. The calculation requires an explicit NYAGI assumption; New York City has a separate named resident-tax component, and Yonkers remains excluded.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $14,750 on $250,000; $34,250 on $500,000; $68,500 on $1,000,000; $137,000 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. For this benchmark only, state AGI is explicitly assumed equal to state taxable income. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the New York retirement-tax details
North CarolinaRead state analysis

North Carolina

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $333,000Monthly gross rent $1,338HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,852

North Carolina withholding tables include a percentage that differs from its 3.99% return rate. The comparison uses the income-tax rate, not the withholding cushion, on North Carolina taxable income.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $9,975 on $250,000; $19,950 on $500,000; $39,900 on $1,000,000; $79,800 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the North Carolina retirement-tax details
North DakotaRead state analysis

North Dakota

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $266,100Monthly gross rent $980HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,414

North Dakota’s 2026 ND-1ES contains annual brackets distinct from wage withholding. The joint zero-rate band extends through $82,800 of state taxable income, followed by 1.95% and 2.5% brackets.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $3,260 on $250,000; $9,209 on $500,000; $21,709 on $1,000,000; $46,709 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the North Dakota retirement-tax details
OhioRead state analysis

Ohio

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $239,800Monthly gross rent $1,090HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,116

Ohio does not apply 2.75% to every taxable wage dollar. The 2026 statute sets tax at zero through $26,050 and then $332 plus 2.75% of the excess; the benchmark implements that formula.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $6,491 on $250,000; $13,366 on $500,000; $27,116 on $1,000,000; $54,616 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Ohio retirement-tax details
OklahomaRead state analysis

Oklahoma

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $222,100Monthly gross rent $1,044HO-3 premium, 2023 $2,486

Oklahoma’s new zero-rate and reduced-rate bands differ for single and joint returns. Future rate triggers are not assumed; the module applies only the enacted 2026 schedule.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $10,821 on $250,000; $22,071 on $500,000; $44,571 on $1,000,000; $89,571 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Oklahoma retirement-tax details
OregonRead state analysis

Oregon

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $497,500Monthly gross rent $1,597HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,003

Oregon’s 2026 state wage schedule excludes Metro, Multnomah County and Portland taxes. A Portland-area comparison needs those named jurisdictions and their own bases rather than a statewide local-tax average.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $21,237 on $250,000; $45,987 on $500,000; $95,487 on $1,000,000; $194,487 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Oregon retirement-tax details
PennsylvaniaRead state analysis

Pennsylvania

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $277,600Monthly gross rent $1,252HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,217

Pennsylvania’s 3.07% compensation-class calculation excludes local earned-income taxes. Losses in an unrelated income class should not be assumed to offset wages or a gain in the benchmark.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $7,675 on $250,000; $15,350 on $500,000; $30,700 on $1,000,000; $61,400 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Pennsylvania retirement-tax details
Rhode IslandRead state analysis

Rhode Island

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $455,700Monthly gross rent $1,418HO-3 premium, 2023 $2,396

Rhode Island’s 2026 regular brackets are the same for the supported filing statuses, but deductions and exemptions are not. At high modified AGI, their phaseout must already be reflected in the supplied taxable base.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $11,843 on $250,000; $26,818 on $500,000; $56,768 on $1,000,000; $116,668 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Rhode Island retirement-tax details
South CarolinaRead state analysis

South Carolina

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $299,500Monthly gross rent $1,272HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,753

South Carolina now starts the individual calculation with federal AGI and a new state deduction. The 1.99%/$30,000 breakpoint and 5.21% upper rate cannot be applied to old federal-taxable-income assumptions without rebuilding the base.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $12,059 on $250,000; $25,084 on $500,000; $51,134 on $1,000,000; $103,234 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the South Carolina retirement-tax details
South DakotaRead state analysis

South Dakota

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $289,600Monthly gross rent $999HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,614

South Dakota is a zero-state-wage-tax tie in 2026. Sales and use tax on a household’s spending or a business’s services belongs in another comparison with an explicit spending base.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $0 on $250,000; $0 on $500,000; $0 on $1,000,000; $0 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the South Dakota retirement-tax details
TennesseeRead state analysis

Tennessee

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $332,600Monthly gross rent $1,284HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,649

Tennessee has no personal wage tax; the Hall tax on certain investment income was repealed from 2021. A business-profit scenario remains different because operating-entity taxes can apply.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $0 on $250,000; $0 on $500,000; $0 on $1,000,000; $0 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Tennessee retirement-tax details
TexasRead state analysis

Texas

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $313,200Monthly gross rent $1,475HO-3 premium, 2023 $2,864

Texas’s individual net-income-tax prohibition supports a zero wage-tax benchmark. That personal result should remain separate from franchise tax on an operating entity or property tax on an owner’s home.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $0 on $250,000; $0 on $500,000; $0 on $1,000,000; $0 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Texas retirement-tax details
UtahRead state analysis

Utah

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $545,200Monthly gross rent $1,593HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,107

Utah’s regular-tax result is before its taxpayer tax credit. A 4.45% multiplication is therefore a schedule comparison, not a claim that every household’s effective rate is 4.45%.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $11,125 on $250,000; $22,250 on $500,000; $44,500 on $1,000,000; $89,000 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Utah retirement-tax details
VermontRead state analysis

Vermont

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $352,800Monthly gross rent $1,319HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,215

Vermont’s Joint Fiscal Office publishes the 2026 annual regular brackets used here. The separate minimum of 3% of federal AGI above $150,000 remains outside this regular-tax comparison, so the result is not a completed return liability.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $14,200 on $250,000; $35,361 on $500,000; $79,111 on $1,000,000; $166,611 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Vermont retirement-tax details
VirginiaRead state analysis

Virginia

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $403,500Monthly gross rent $1,646HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,537

Virginia’s upper regular rate is 5.75% above $17,000 of taxable income. The guide assumes one earner, so it does not claim a spouse tax adjustment that requires qualifying income earned by both spouses.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $14,118 on $250,000; $28,493 on $500,000; $57,243 on $1,000,000; $114,743 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Virginia retirement-tax details
WashingtonRead state analysis

Washington

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $602,200Monthly gross rent $1,824HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,232

Washington has no 2026 wage income tax; its newly enacted individual income tax begins in 2028. Existing capital-gains excise tax remains separate, with 7% on the first $1 million of taxable Washington gains and 9.9% above.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $0 on $250,000; $0 on $500,000; $0 on $1,000,000; $0 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Washington retirement-tax details
West VirginiaRead state analysis

West Virginia

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $170,800Monthly gross rent $883HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,179

West Virginia cut rates again for 2026, bringing the upper rate to 4.58%. The module uses the retroactive 2026 schedule and not the superseded 4.82% top rate.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $10,653 on $250,000; $22,103 on $500,000; $45,003 on $1,000,000; $90,803 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the West Virginia retirement-tax details
WisconsinRead state analysis

Wisconsin

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $294,700Monthly gross rent $1,142HO-3 premium, 2023 $923

Wisconsin’s 2026 estimate instructions provide the indexed regular brackets used here. Capital-gain exclusions and alternative-minimum tax are separate, so a business-sale outcome cannot be read directly from this wage table.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $12,445 on $250,000; $27,020 on $500,000; $65,270 on $1,000,000; $141,770 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Wisconsin retirement-tax details
WyomingRead state analysis

Wyoming

Back to comparison ↑
Median home $339,500Monthly gross rent $998HO-3 premium, 2023 $1,853

Wyoming is tied at zero in the 2026 personal wage-tax comparison. A Wyoming entity registration does not establish that its owner changed domicile or that income earned elsewhere loses its original state source.

For one-earner married households, the regular state wage-tax benchmarks are $0 on $250,000; $0 on $500,000; $0 on $1,000,000; $0 on $2,000,000 of state taxable income. These four points show how the schedule changes as the taxable base increases. Local tax and credits are excluded; the figures do not start with gross salary.

Read the Wyoming retirement-tax details
Taxstra methodologyScoring factors, weights, research profiles and limitations.

How Taxstra grades each state out of 10

This guide ranks one financial result, such as a tax bill or deduction. Lifestyle does not change that number. Other category tiles provide extra context and are labeled when they do not affect the overall score.

What does a score out of 10 mean?

For financial categories, 10 is the strongest result in the comparison and 1 is the weakest. Lower costs generally score better; higher pay scores better. A 7.9 is a comparison tool, not a promise about your finances.

Why can scores and ranks look different?

Cards show one decimal place, while rankings use two. Two states can both display 7.9 and still have slightly different ranks. States with the same ranking value share a rank.

Which WalletHub ranking do we use?

We use WalletHub’s Quality of Life category, not its overall ranking. For example, Illinois is fifth for Quality of Life and eighteenth overall in the cited study. Those are two different measures.

What if information is missing?

We leave it missing instead of guessing. If a required factor is unavailable, we label the score provisional and do not give it an overall rank.

Technical formulas and source definitions
Financial categories: actual measurement spread
The most favorable observed value receives 10 and the least favorable receives 1. Intermediate grades are scaled linearly between them: 1 + 9 × the favorable share of the observed range. Lower costs score higher; higher pay scores higher. If every observation is identical, each receives 5.5. These relative grades do not have a universal pass/fail cutoff. Extreme observations can widen the range and compress other grades. We do not narrow a genuine gap just to produce a tighter leaderboard; a change to a source population must have a documented measurement reason. The STR grade is a regional spending-cost screen. Hotel employment is excluded from its score because hotel jobs do not measure residential STR demand; actual occupancy and booking revenue require local property research.
Malpractice and rental taxes: defined samples
The physician index weights CMS county malpractice-cost observations by their malpractice RVUs within each state. It uses the underlying 2026 update, based on 2023 premiums and RVUs, before Medicare payment adjustments. State-specific specialty mix, missing insurer types and CMS imputation limit its use as a quote comparison. Apartment-tax comparisons hold building and fixture values constant and average the study’s named urban and rural municipalities equally. Including both reduces dependence on one city; it still does not represent all localities. They are neither statewide tax rates nor single-family STR bills.
Quality of life: the source category, not the overall WalletHub rank
We use the quality-of-life category of WalletHub’s 2026 state study, published August 10, 2026. Taxstra converts its rank to a grade using 1 + 9 × (50 − rank) / 49. The publisher’s category includes amenities, mobility, leisure, weather and environmental conditions. WalletHub’s overall ranking also includes affordability, economy, education and health, and safety. We use its narrower quality-of-life category as an amenities and daily-life input; our financial factors already measure costs separately. For example, Illinois is #5 in that category and #18 overall in WalletHub. Taxstra’s own guide ranking is a third, separately calculated result. Differences in these rank-based grades are not measured differences in happiness.
Overall grade and rank
Multiply each unrounded component grade by its published weight, add the results, then display one decimal place. Round the composite to two decimals for ranking and retain genuine ties at that precision. Cards display one decimal for readability; two cards displaying 7.9 can therefore have different positions. The table tooltip and downloadable dataset include the ranking value. For example, financial 6.0 and quality of life 9.0 produce 6.6 at 80% financial / 20% quality-of-life weights. Direct tax and deduction comparisons rank their displayed dollar outcomes and show a separate normalized category grade.
Incomplete evidence
Unavailable category data receives no grade. When a weighted component is missing, the remaining components are reweighted and the card labels the result provisional, shows evidence coverage and excludes it from the overall rank. The presence of a numeric provisional grade is not evidence that the missing category was measured.
What a grade does not claim
These are screening grades, not completed all-factor tax or legal rankings. The named tax benchmarks and CMS malpractice-cost index are included only where the displayed weights say so. Full-return taxes, individual insurance quotes and legal-policy judgments remain separate. A high amenities grade does not mean that everyone prefers the state. Family ties, local neighborhoods, climate preferences and a particular job can outweigh statewide observations.

For investment guides, livability describes market context; it does not forecast rent growth or returns and does not assume that the investor lives in the property’s state. In guides about tax bills, the tax calculations stay separate from lifestyle grades.

Research examples and calculation assumptions

Taxstra's research profiles

A useful comparison holds the household and property constant. These are the exact starting profiles for the tax research; a scenario is not a completed tax estimate unless its result is explicitly shown.

Physician employment
$500,000 in wages, one earner, no dependents, no elective retirement contributions. Married filing jointly and single results are separate. The score’s separate tax sensitivity uses $500,000 of state taxable wage income with state AGI equal to that base; it is not a gross-to-taxable return calculation. Compensation observations use the BLS occupation specified beside the result and exclude self-employment.
Contracting and business ownership
$500,000 of profit before owner compensation. An S-corp example tests a $250,000 owner wage; that is a sensitivity assumption, not a reasonable-compensation opinion. The separate employee-payroll example is five employees at $100,000 each. Employee wages already included in operating expenses are never deducted twice.
Retirement
Both spouses are 67, married filing jointly, receiving $120,000 from traditional retirement accounts, $60,000 in private pensions, $60,000 in Social Security, $30,000 in ordinary investment income and $30,000 in long-term capital gains. Each spouse receives half. Total cash income is $300,000; taxable income depends on the income category and applicable rules. Full-year residents. Qualified traditional distributions; employer-funded defined-benefit pension; 401(k) entirely employee elective deferrals with no employer contributions; IRA entirely self-funded with no exempt pension rollover; Pennsylvania-eligible retirement distributions after retirement. Exclusions are applied to qualifying plan income first where several income categories are eligible. No federal or state tax bill is estimated.
Property acquisition
A debt-free $1 million purchase, with $200,000 allocated to land. The long-term rental example assumes $90,000 of rent and $30,000 of expenses before property tax, insurance and depreciation. The STR example assumes $150,000 of bookings and $75,000 of expenses on the same basis. These are research starting profiles, not market forecasts. The standardized scored apartment example is different: $600,000 land and building plus $30,000 fixtures, with the same values across named municipalities. The STR worked example uses a separately labeled fixed property scenario. It does not change the statewide ranking or represent forecast bookings.
Depreciation
A sensitivity considers an additional $100,000 deduction that the taxpayer can currently use. An addback can defer a state benefit even when federal expensing is available. A current deduction, a future recovery and a permanent tax reduction are different results.
State and local scope
Property location and owner residence are separate inputs. There is no assumed “average” local income tax. A combined state/local result needs a named locality and its resident or nonresident rules. Figures explicitly labeled state-only exclude local tax.

How to reproduce a comparison

  1. Choose the named measure and its source year.
  2. Apply the formula displayed beside the map to the source observation for each state.
  3. Round money to whole dollars, ratios to two decimal places and grades to one decimal place. Rank in the direction stated by the measure: the tax-penalty guide places the largest burden first, while its tax-cost grade still rewards a lower bill. Changing display order does not change a state’s rank.
  4. Give equal ranking values the same competition rank (composites use two decimals; cards show one). After a tie, skip the occupied positions.
  5. Leave suppressed or unavailable observations unranked. Retain the state in the table and describe the gap.

A price-adjusted wage, a homeowner tax bill and a lodging-employment concentration answer different questions. The balanced view explicitly combines the guide’s named financial factors with livability at the displayed weights. Other categories provide context. A favorable legal policy is not treated as a measured dollar saving. Material modeling assumptions require review before a full financial ranking is released.

The financial profiles are a $500,000 W-2 household, a business with $500,000 profit before owner compensation, a five-person $500,000 payroll, and a married age-67 household with $300,000 of mixed retirement and investment income. Investor examples assume the purchase location is separate from the owner’s residence.

These scenarios define the research questions. Unless a completed calculation is explicitly shown, a profile is not an estimated return. Tax sensitivities use separately supplied state-taxable wage or ordinary-business bases, exclude local tax and do not replace full-return calculations. We do not calculate with unverified secondary-source schedules.

Published survey estimates have sampling error. We preserve available Census margins of error and BLS relative errors in the source data. Small apparent differences should not be treated as certainty. A comprehensive state decision still requires the actual locality, household, property, employer and coverage terms.

Sources and measurement datesOriginal datasets, primary authority, verification dates and downloadable research.

Download the published 50-state dataset (CSV) · Dataset definitions and coverage

Economic observations were retrieved September 12, 2026. Measurement years differ because the agencies publish on different schedules. Existing retirement rules retain their August 4, 2026 review date; existing PTET and depreciation research retain August 30, 2026. Unresolved entries remain identified.

The Census property-tax figure is a median dollar bill on owner-occupied homes, not a tax rate on rentals. BLS physician wages exclude self-employment. NAIC premiums describe owner-occupied HO-3 policies. CMS healthcare spending includes several payers and all ages. BLS accommodation employment includes hotels and other lodging; it is not STR revenue.

State-specific primary-authority links appear with each state. A source listed for one tax category does not verify a different category.

Common questions

Why is a state left unranked?

A state is unranked when a complete applicable schedule is unavailable. Idaho’s 2026 indexed threshold remains unverified in this model. New York and Connecticut are calculated with state AGI explicitly assumed equal to taxable income; the separate New York example lets you change AGI. Missing data is never treated as zero or filled from a prior-year table.

Does the tax rank include quality of life?

No. This is a financial tax comparison. Livability may be displayed alongside it but does not change the tax rank.

Does livability change which state has the biggest income-tax bill?

No. Tax comparisons remain tax comparisons. Livability is a separate decision factor and must not change a factual ranking of calculated tax bills. A higher-tax state may still be the right personal choice.

Does the tax comparison include every state and local tax?

No. Available calculations are labeled state-taxable-wage benchmarks and exclude local tax. Unfinished household, business and capital-gain calculations remain unavailable. Do not interpret them as complete combined-burden estimates.

Why compare several income levels?

An income change can alter the applicable brackets, deductions and other adjustments. A ranking at one income level does not establish the outcome at another. Each scenario needs its own calculation.

How should a high earner compare a potential move?

Hold income type and household facts constant, identify the actual locality, and compare the resulting financial plan with career and lifestyle preferences. Avoid comparing a state-only figure with another place’s state-plus-city result.

Why can the WalletHub rank differ from the rank on this card?

The card identifies WalletHub’s Quality of Life category rank. The linked study also has a separate Overall Rank column that incorporates affordability, economy, education and health, and safety. Illinois is #5 in Quality of Life but #18 overall in the 2026 WalletHub study. Taxstra’s headline rank combines the named financial factors with that quality-of-life category using our published weights; it is not WalletHub’s overall ranking.

Can readers customize the published ranking?

No. Each guide uses one fixed methodology and the same assumptions for every state. State search, map selection, shared links and embedded cards all use that published ranking. Separate financial examples explain the assumptions without changing the leaderboard.

How does Taxstra include livability in the ranking?

Composite guides combine their named financial factors with WalletHub’s Quality of Life category at fixed, guide-specific weights: 80% financial and 20% quality of life for physician and retirement composites; 90% financial and 10% quality of life for business and property composites. Direct tax, PTET and depreciation comparisons do not include quality of life in their ranking. Everyone sees the same ranking; choosing a state changes the displayed card, not the methodology. The score is a comparison tool, not an estimate of happiness or a completed tax return.

What does the livability measure include?

We use WalletHub’s 2026 quality-of-life category, which considers amenities, mobility, environmental conditions and leisure. Its methodology is linked in the sources. This category does not fully capture family ties, personal climate preferences, a particular school district or an individual neighborhood.

Does a score of 8.0 mean a state is 80% better?

No. The 1–10 grades describe relative results within the comparison. A score of 8.0 is neither a percentage tax saving nor a probability that you will enjoy living there. Review the underlying measures, fixed weights and limitations before making a shortlist.

Why can two states share a rank?

Taxstra ranks composite scores rounded to two decimals while cards display one decimal. Equal ranking values share the same competition rank. Direct dollar comparisons rank whole-dollar outcomes. Missing observations remain unranked when the selected calculation needs them; they are not replaced with zero.

Continue your research

Use the related calculator · View all 14 guides

Make the comparison yours.

Bring your offer, income mix or property numbers. Taxstra can help connect the state rules to a coordinated plan.